Passias Peter G, Soroceanu Alex, Smith Justin, Boniello Anthony, Yang Sun, Scheer Justin K, Schwab Frank, Shaffrey Christopher, Kim Han Jo, Protopsaltis Themistocles, Mundis Gregory, Gupta Munish, Klineberg Eric, Lafage Virginie, Ames Christopher
*Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, NY †Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, VA ‡Department of Neurological Surgery, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL §Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY ¶San Diego Center for Spinal Disorders, La Jolla, CA ∥Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA **Department of Neurosurgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; and ††International Spine Study Group, Littleton, CO.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Mar 1;40(5):283-91. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000746.
Retrospective review of prospective multicenter database.
Quantify the incidence of new onset cervical deformity (CD) after adult spinal deformity surgery of the thoracolumbar spine, identify predictors of development, and determine the impact on outcomes.
High prevalence of residual CD has been identified after surgical treatment of adult spinal deformity. Development of new onset CD is less understood and its clinical impact unclear.
A total of 215 patients with complete 2-year follow-up and full-length radiographs met inclusion criteria. CD was defined by T1 slope minus Cervical Lordosis (CL) more than 20°, C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis more than 40 mm, or C2-C7 kyphosis more than 10°. Univariate analysis was performed using t tests or tests of proportion. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine independent predictors of new onset CD. The impact of CD on health-related quality of life and satisfaction was measured using repeated measures mixed models or logistic regression as appropriate, accounting for potential confounders.
The overall rate of CD at 2 years after surgery was 63%. Univariate analysis revealed that patients who developed new onset CD postoperatively had higher incidence of diabetes (7.35% vs. 1.28%, P = 0.05), increased preoperative C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis (P = 0.04) and C2 slope (P = 0.038), and smaller diameter rods used at surgery (P = 0.032). Independent predictors of new onset CD at 2 years included: diabetes (odds ratio, 10.49; P = 0.046) and increased preoperative T1 slope minus cervical lordosis (odds ratio, 1.08/º; P = 0.022). Ending instrumentation below T4 was a negative predictor (odds ratio, 0.31; P = 0.019). Patients with and without CD experienced improvements in 2-year 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (P = 0.0001), Oswestry Disability Index (P = 0.0001), and Scoliosis Research Society (P = 0.0001). Rates and overall improvement were similar. CD was not associated with decreased satisfaction (P = 0.28).
A total of 47.7% of patients without preoperative CD developed new onset postoperative CD after thoracolumbar surgery. Independent predictors of new onset CD at 2 years included diabetes, higher preoperative T1 slope minus cervical lordosis, and ending instrumentation above T4. Significant improvements in health-related quality of life scores occurred despite the development of postoperative CD.
对前瞻性多中心数据库进行回顾性分析。
量化胸腰椎成人脊柱畸形手术后新发颈椎畸形(CD)的发生率,确定其发展的预测因素,并确定其对治疗结果的影响。
成人脊柱畸形手术治疗后已发现残留CD的高发生率。对新发CD的发展了解较少,其临床影响尚不清楚。
共有215例有完整2年随访和全长X线片的患者符合纳入标准。CD的定义为T1斜率减去颈椎前凸(CL)大于20°、C2-C7矢状垂直轴大于40mm或C2-C7后凸大于10°。使用t检验或比例检验进行单因素分析。多因素逻辑回归用于确定新发CD的独立预测因素。酌情使用重复测量混合模型或逻辑回归测量CD对健康相关生活质量和满意度的影响,并考虑潜在的混杂因素。
术后2年CD的总体发生率为63%。单因素分析显示,术后发生新发CD的患者糖尿病发生率较高(7.35%对1.28%,P=0.05),术前C2-C7矢状垂直轴(P=0.04)和C2斜率(P=0.038)增加,手术中使用的棒直径较小(P=0.032)。术后2年新发CD的独立预测因素包括:糖尿病(比值比,10.49;P=0.046)和术前T1斜率减去颈椎前凸增加(比值比,1.08/°;P=0.022)。器械固定终止于T4以下是一个负向预测因素(比值比,0.31;P=0.019)。有CD和无CD的患者在2年的36项简短健康调查(P=0.0001)、Oswestry功能障碍指数(P=0.0001)和脊柱侧凸研究学会(P=0.0001)方面均有改善。改善率和总体改善情况相似。CD与满意度降低无关(P=0.28)。
胸腰椎手术后,共有47.7%术前无CD的患者发生了术后新发CD。术后2年新发CD的独立预测因素包括糖尿病、术前较高的T1斜率减去颈椎前凸以及器械固定终止于T4以上。尽管发生了术后CD,但健康相关生活质量评分仍有显著改善。
2级。