Webster Fiona, Krueger Paul, MacDonald Heather, Archibald Douglas, Telner Deanna, Bytautas Jessica, Whitehead Cynthia
Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, 500 University Avenue, 5th Floor, M5G 1V7, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Health and BioSciences, Reference Services, Carlton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, K1S 5B6, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
BMC Med Educ. 2015 Apr 18;15:79. doi: 10.1186/s12909-015-0350-1.
BACKGROUND: Little is known about the state of education research within family medicine. As family medicine education models develop, it is important to develop an understanding of the current state of this research and develop ways to advance the field. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review of family medicine education research to describe 1) research topic areas and 2) the methodologies and methods used to study these topics. MEDLINE, Social Sciences Abstracts and ERIC electronic databases were searched. 817 full text articles from 2002 to 2012 were screened; 624 articles were included in the review. RESULTS: The following research topic areas were identified: continuing education, curriculum development, undergraduate education, teaching methods, assessment techniques, selection of entrants, non-clinical skills, professional and faculty development, clinical decision-making and resident well-being. Quantitative studies comprised the large majority of research approaches; overall minimal methodological details were provided. CONCLUSIONS: Our review highlights an overall need for increased sophisticated in methodological approaches to education research in family medicine, a problem that could be ameliorated by multiple strategies including better engagement of methodologists throughout the research process. The results provide guidance for future family medicine education research programs.
背景:关于家庭医学领域内教育研究的现状,人们了解甚少。随着家庭医学教育模式的发展,了解该研究的当前状况并找到推动该领域发展的方法很重要。 方法:我们对家庭医学教育研究进行了一项范围综述,以描述1)研究主题领域,以及2)用于研究这些主题的方法和手段。检索了MEDLINE、社会科学文摘和教育资源信息中心(ERIC)电子数据库。筛选了2002年至2012年的817篇全文文章;624篇文章被纳入综述。 结果:确定了以下研究主题领域:继续教育、课程开发、本科教育、教学方法、评估技术、入学选拔、非临床技能、专业及教师发展、临床决策和住院医师福祉。定量研究占研究方法的绝大多数;总体而言,提供的方法细节很少。 结论:我们的综述强调,家庭医学教育研究在方法上总体需要提高复杂性,这一问题可以通过多种策略得到改善,包括在整个研究过程中让方法学家更好地参与。研究结果为未来的家庭医学教育研究项目提供了指导。
BMC Med Educ. 2015-4-18
Nord Med. 1992
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015-10
Scott Med J. 1986-7
Med J Aust. 1992-3-16
Kans J Med. 2025-2-17
JBI Evid Synth. 2025-4-1
J Dent Educ. 2025-3
Healthcare (Basel). 2023-7-26
Med Educ. 2021-6
Med Teach. 2013-4-22
Med Teach. 2012-12-11
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2011-10-5
Med Educ. 2011-1
Implement Sci. 2010-9-20
Med Educ. 2010-4