• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

范围研究:方法学的推进。

Scoping studies: advancing the methodology.

机构信息

School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, 1400 Main Street West, Room 403, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Implement Sci. 2010 Sep 20;5:69. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-69.

DOI:10.1186/1748-5908-5-69
PMID:20854677
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2954944/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Scoping studies are an increasingly popular approach to reviewing health research evidence. In 2005, Arksey and O'Malley published the first methodological framework for conducting scoping studies. While this framework provides an excellent foundation for scoping study methodology, further clarifying and enhancing this framework will help support the consistency with which authors undertake and report scoping studies and may encourage researchers and clinicians to engage in this process.

DISCUSSION

We build upon our experiences conducting three scoping studies using the Arksey and O'Malley methodology to propose recommendations that clarify and enhance each stage of the framework. Recommendations include: clarifying and linking the purpose and research question (stage one); balancing feasibility with breadth and comprehensiveness of the scoping process (stage two); using an iterative team approach to selecting studies (stage three) and extracting data (stage four); incorporating a numerical summary and qualitative thematic analysis, reporting results, and considering the implications of study findings to policy, practice, or research (stage five); and incorporating consultation with stakeholders as a required knowledge translation component of scoping study methodology (stage six). Lastly, we propose additional considerations for scoping study methodology in order to support the advancement, application and relevance of scoping studies in health research.

SUMMARY

Specific recommendations to clarify and enhance this methodology are outlined for each stage of the Arksey and O'Malley framework. Continued debate and development about scoping study methodology will help to maximize the usefulness and rigor of scoping study findings within healthcare research and practice.

摘要

背景

范围综述是一种越来越受欢迎的健康研究证据综述方法。2005 年,Arksey 和 O'Malley 发布了第一个进行范围综述的方法学框架。虽然该框架为范围综述方法学提供了极好的基础,但进一步阐明和加强该框架将有助于支持作者一致地进行和报告范围综述,并可能鼓励研究人员和临床医生参与这一过程。

讨论

我们根据使用 Arksey 和 O'Malley 方法进行的三项范围综述的经验,提出了建议,以阐明和加强该框架的每个阶段。建议包括:澄清和链接目的和研究问题(第一阶段);平衡可行性与范围综述过程的广度和全面性(第二阶段);使用迭代团队方法选择研究(第三阶段)和提取数据(第四阶段);纳入数字摘要和定性主题分析、报告结果,并考虑研究结果对政策、实践或研究的影响(第五阶段);以及将与利益相关者的协商作为范围综述方法学的必要知识转化组成部分(第六阶段)。最后,我们提出了范围综述方法学的其他考虑因素,以支持范围综述在健康研究中的推进、应用和相关性。

总结

针对 Arksey 和 O'Malley 框架的每个阶段,都详细列出了阐明和加强该方法的具体建议。持续的辩论和发展将有助于最大限度地提高范围综述在医疗保健研究和实践中的有用性和严谨性。

相似文献

1
Scoping studies: advancing the methodology.范围研究:方法学的推进。
Implement Sci. 2010 Sep 20;5:69. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-69.
2
Enhancing the scoping study methodology: a large, inter-professional team's experience with Arksey and O'Malley's framework.强化范围研究方法学:一个大型跨专业团队对阿斯基和奥马利框架的应用经验。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Mar 23;13:48. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-48.
3
From Arksey and O'Malley and Beyond: Customizations to enhance a team-based, mixed approach to scoping review methodology.从阿克西和奥马利方法及其他方法:定制化以增强基于团队的混合式范围综述方法。
MethodsX. 2021 May 7;8:101375. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2021.101375. eCollection 2021.
4
An Evidence-Based Approach to Scoping Reviews.一种基于证据的范围综述方法。
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2016 Apr;13(2):118-23. doi: 10.1111/wvn.12144. Epub 2016 Jan 28.
5
Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting.范围综述:定义、方法和报告需更加清晰。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Dec;67(12):1291-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.03.013. Epub 2014 Jul 14.
6
Protocol for a scoping review to map patient engagement in scoping reviews.一项关于绘制患者参与范围综述情况的范围综述方案。
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Jun 20;8(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00361-x.
7
A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency.范围综述的范围综述:推进方法并提高一致性。
Res Synth Methods. 2014 Dec;5(4):371-85. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1123. Epub 2014 Jul 24.
8
An Indigenous-informed scoping review study methodology: advancing the science of scoping reviews.基于原住民知情的范围综述研究方法:推进范围综述科学。
Syst Rev. 2024 Jul 15;13(1):181. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02586-1.
9
Methods for the health technology assessment of complex interventions: a protocol for a scoping review.复杂干预措施的卫生技术评估方法:一项范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 30;10(11):e039263. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039263.
10
Study protocol for a scoping review on rehabilitation scoping reviews.康复范围综述的范围综述研究方案。
Clin Rehabil. 2017 Sep;31(9):1249-1256. doi: 10.1177/0269215516688514. Epub 2017 Jan 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Postpartum Haemorrhage Burden, Management and Challenges in Malaysia: A Scoping Review and Expert Recommendations for Effective Management.马来西亚产后出血的负担、管理与挑战:一项范围综述及有效管理的专家建议
Cureus. 2025 Aug 12;17(8):e89915. doi: 10.7759/cureus.89915. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
A scoping review of physical activity interventions to support the mental health of students aged 16 to 25.一项关于支持16至25岁学生心理健康的体育活动干预措施的范围综述。
Discov Public Health. 2025;22(1):538. doi: 10.1186/s12982-025-00933-8. Epub 2025 Sep 12.
3
Leg-foot chest compressions: a scoping review.腿-足胸部按压:一项范围综述
Resusc Plus. 2025 Aug 12;26:101056. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2025.101056. eCollection 2025 Nov.
4
Digital ecosystems for healthcare communication and collaboration: A scoping review.用于医疗保健沟通与协作的数字生态系统:一项范围综述。
Digit Health. 2025 Sep 12;11:20552076251377933. doi: 10.1177/20552076251377933. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
5
Embodied Mindfulness Through Movement: A Scoping Review of Dance-Based Interventions for Mental Well-Being in Recreational Populations.通过运动实现具身正念:对休闲人群心理健康的舞蹈干预的范围综述。
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Sep 5;13(17):2230. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13172230.
6
Occupational Therapy Interventions in Mental Health During Lockdown: A Scoping Review.封锁期间心理健康领域的职业治疗干预:一项范围综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Aug 27;13(17):2136. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13172136.
7
Elementary students' social, emotional, and cognitive development during the COVID- 19 pandemic in North America: A scoping review.北美新冠疫情期间小学生的社会、情感和认知发展:一项范围综述
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Sep 11;5(9):e0005148. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0005148. eCollection 2025.
8
Use of viscoelastic testing in the transfusion management of burn patients: a scoping review.粘弹性测试在烧伤患者输血管理中的应用:一项范围综述
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2025 Sep 11. doi: 10.1007/s11239-025-03173-4.
9
A scoping review of women's experiences and barriers in automated vehicle research.对女性在自动驾驶汽车研究中的经历与障碍的范围综述。
PLoS One. 2025 Sep 10;20(9):e0331402. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0331402. eCollection 2025.
10
Player-Level Tackle Training Interventions in Tackle-Collision Sports: A Systematic Scoping Review.对抗性碰撞运动中球员级别的擒抱训练干预措施:一项系统性综述。
Sports Med Open. 2025 Sep 10;11(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s40798-025-00888-9.

本文引用的文献

1
A scoping review of the use of theory in studies of knowledge translation.知识转化研究中理论运用的范围综述。
Can J Occup Ther. 2010 Dec;77(5):270-9. doi: 10.2182/cjot.2010.77.5.3.
2
Using scoping literature reviews as a means of understanding and interpreting existing literature.使用综述性文献回顾作为理解和阐释现有文献的一种方式。
Work. 2010;35(3):399-404. doi: 10.3233/WOR-2010-0998.
3
Overview of a formal scoping review on health system report cards.健康体系报告卡的正式范围综述概述。
Implement Sci. 2010 Jan 15;5:2. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-2.
4
The application of motor learning strategies within functionally based interventions for children with neuromotor conditions.运动学习策略在针对神经运动障碍儿童的基于功能的干预措施中的应用。
Pediatr Phys Ther. 2009 Winter;21(4):345-55. doi: 10.1097/PEP.0b013e3181beb09d.
5
A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies.综述的类型学:对14种综述类型及相关方法的分析。
Health Info Libr J. 2009 Jun;26(2):91-108. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x.
6
What are scoping studies? A review of the nursing literature.什么是范围界定研究?护理文献综述。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2009 Oct;46(10):1386-400. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.02.010. Epub 2009 Mar 27.
7
Scoping the field: identifying key research priorities in HIV and rehabilitation.范围界定:确定艾滋病毒和康复领域的关键研究重点。
AIDS Behav. 2010 Apr;14(2):448-58. doi: 10.1007/s10461-009-9528-z. Epub 2009 Mar 10.
8
Asking the right questions: scoping studies in the commissioning of research on the organisation and delivery of health services.提出正确的问题:卫生服务组织与提供研究委托中的范围界定研究
Health Res Policy Syst. 2008 Jul 9;6:7. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-6-7.
9
Lost in knowledge translation: time for a map?迷失在知识转化之中:是不是该有一张路线图了?
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2006 Winter;26(1):13-24. doi: 10.1002/chp.47.
10
How good is the quality of health care in the United States? 1998.1998年美国医疗保健的质量如何?
Milbank Q. 2005;83(4):843-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00403.x.