Johnson Gemma L, Sarker Shah-Jalal, Nannini Francesco, Ferrini Arianna, Taylor Emma, Lass-Flörl Cornelia, Mutschlechner Wolfgang, Bustin Stephen A, Agrawal Samir G
Blizard Institute of Cell and Molecular Science, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
Centre for Experimental Cancer Medicine, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
J Clin Microbiol. 2015 Jul;53(7):2103-8. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00110-15. Epub 2015 Apr 22.
Clinical experience with the impact of serum biomarkers for invasive fungal disease (IFD) varies markedly in hemato-oncology. Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) is the most common manifestation, so we evaluated biomarkers in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid. An Aspergillus-specific lateral-flow device (LFD), quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR), and the galactomannan (GM) test were used with 32 BAL fluid samples from 32 patients at risk of IPA. Eight patients had proven IPA, 3 had probable IPA, 6 had possible IPA, and 15 patients had no IPA by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group/Mycoses Study Group of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (EORTC/MSG) criteria. The diagnostic accuracies of the tests were evaluated, and pairwise agreement between biomarkers was calculated. The diagnostic performance of the EORTC/MSG criteria was evaluated against the test(s) identified to be the most useful for IPA diagnosis. Using the EORTC/MSG criteria, the sensitivities of qPCR and LFD were 100% and the sensitivity of the GM test was 87.5% (GM test index cutoff, >0.8), with the tests having specificities of between 66.7 and 86.7%. The agreement between the results of qPCR and LFD was almost perfect (Cohen's kappa coefficient = 0.93, 95% confidence interval, 0.81 to 1.00). LFD and qPCR combined had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 85.7%. Calcofluor staining and culture of all BAL fluid samples were negative for fungal infection. The median time from the start of mold-active antifungal therapy to the time of collection of BAL fluid was 6 days. Reversing roles and using dual testing by LFD and qPCR to classify cases, the EORTC/MSG criteria had a sensitivity of 83.3%. All three tests are useful for the diagnosis of IPA in BAL fluid samples. Despite the significant delays between the start of antifungal therapy and bronchoscopy, unlike microscopy and culture, the biomarkers remained informative. In particular, the combination of LFD and qPCR allows the sensitive and specific detection of IPA.
血清生物标志物对血液肿瘤患者侵袭性真菌病(IFD)影响的临床经验差异显著。侵袭性肺曲霉病(IPA)是最常见的表现形式,因此我们对支气管肺泡灌洗(BAL)液中的生物标志物进行了评估。使用一种曲霉特异性侧流装置(LFD)、定量实时聚合酶链反应(qPCR)和半乳甘露聚糖(GM)检测法,对32例有IPA风险患者的32份BAL液样本进行检测。根据欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织侵袭性真菌感染协作组/美国国立过敏与传染病研究所真菌病研究组(EORTC/MSG)标准,8例患者确诊为IPA,3例可能为IPA,6例可能为IPA,15例患者无IPA。评估了这些检测方法的诊断准确性,并计算了生物标志物之间的两两一致性。对照被确定对IPA诊断最有用的检测方法,评估了EORTC/MSG标准的诊断性能。根据EORTC/MSG标准,qPCR和LFD的敏感性为100%,GM检测的敏感性为87.5%(GM检测指数临界值>0.8),这些检测方法的特异性在66.7%至86.7%之间。qPCR和LFD结果之间的一致性几乎完美(Cohen's kappa系数 = 0.93,95%置信区间,0.81至1.00)。LFD和qPCR联合检测的敏感性为100%,特异性为85.7%。所有BAL液样本的荧光增白剂染色和培养均未发现真菌感染。从开始使用抗霉菌活性抗真菌治疗到采集BAL液的中位时间为6天。颠倒角色,使用LFD和qPCR双重检测对病例进行分类,EORTC/MSG标准的敏感性为83.3%。所有这三种检测方法都有助于诊断BAL液样本中的IPA。尽管抗真菌治疗开始与支气管镜检查之间存在显著延迟,但与显微镜检查和培养不同,这些生物标志物仍然具有信息价值。特别是,LFD和qPCR联合使用能够灵敏且特异的检测出IPA。