Miceli Marisa H, Goggins Michael I, Chander Pranay, Sekaran Archana K, Kizy Anne E, Samuel Linoj, Jiang Hui, Thornton Christopher R, Ramesh Mayur, Alangaden George
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA.
Mycoses. 2015 Jun;58(6):368-74. doi: 10.1111/myc.12327.
Early diagnosis of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) remains difficult due to the variable performance of the tests used. We compared the performance characteristics of Aspergillus lateral flow device (LFD) in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) vs. BAL-galactomannan (GM), for the diagnosis of IPA. 311 BAL specimens were prospectively collected from patients who underwent bronchoscopy from January to May 2013. Patients at risk for IPA were divided into haematological malignancy (HEM) and non-HEM groups: solid organ transplants (SOT) (lung transplant (LT) and non-LT SOT); chronic steroid use (CSU); solid tumour (STU) and others. We identified 96 patients at risk for IPA; 89 patients (93%) were in the non-HEM groups: SOT 57 (LT, 46, non-LT SOT, 11); CSU 21; STU 6, other 5. Only three patients met criteria for IA (two probable; one possible). Overall sensitivity (SS) was 66% for both and specificity (SP) was 94% vs. 52% for LFD and GM respectively. LFD and GM performance was similar in the HEM group (SS 100% for both and SP 83% vs. 100% respectively). LFD performance was better than GM among non-HEM SOT patients (P = 0.02). Most false-positive GM results occurred in the SOT group (50.8%), especially among LT patients (56.5%). LFD performance was superior with an overall SP of 95.6% in SOT (P < 0.002) and 97% in LT patients (P = 0.0008). LFD is a rapid and simple test that can be performed on BAL to rule out IPA.
由于所使用检测方法的性能各异,侵袭性肺曲霉病(IPA)的早期诊断仍然困难。我们比较了支气管肺泡灌洗(BAL)中曲霉侧流装置(LFD)与BAL-半乳甘露聚糖(GM)在诊断IPA方面的性能特征。2013年1月至5月期间,前瞻性收集了311例接受支气管镜检查患者的BAL标本。有IPA风险的患者分为血液系统恶性肿瘤(HEM)组和非HEM组:实体器官移植(SOT)(肺移植(LT)和非LT SOT);长期使用类固醇(CSU);实体瘤(STU)和其他。我们确定了96例有IPA风险的患者;89例(93%)在非HEM组:SOT 57例(LT 46例,非LT SOT 11例);CSU 21例;STU 6例,其他5例。只有3例患者符合侵袭性曲霉病标准(2例可能;1例可能)。两者的总体敏感性(SS)均为66%,特异性(SP)分别为94%和52%(LFD和GM)。在HEM组中,LFD和GM的性能相似(两者SS均为100%,SP分别为83%和100%)。在非HEM SOT患者中,LFD的性能优于GM(P = 0.02)。大多数GM假阳性结果出现在SOT组(50.8%),尤其是LT患者(56.5%)。LFD的性能更优,在SOT组总体SP为95.6%(P < 0.002),在LT患者中为97%(P = 0.0008)。LFD是一种快速简便的检测方法,可用于BAL以排除IPA。