Chu William, Loblaw D Andrew, Chan Kelvin, Morton Gerard, Choo Richard, Szumacher Ewa, Danjoux Cyril, Pignol Jean-Philippe, Cheung Patrick
Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Ave., Toronto, ON, M4N 3 M5, Canada.
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Radiat Oncol. 2015 Apr 18;10:95. doi: 10.1186/s13014-015-0400-1.
This is the final report of a prospective phase I study which evaluated the feasibility, toxicities, and biochemical control in prostate cancer patients treated with a hypofractionated boost utilizing a fiducial marker-based daily image guidance strategy and small patient-specific PTV margins.
Low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients underwent transperineal ultrasound-guided implantation of three gold fiducial markers and were treated with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy to 42 Gy (2 Gy/day). During the first nine fractions of treatment, pre- and post-treatment electronic portal imaging was performed to calculate intrafraction prostate motion. Patient-specific PTV margins were derived and a 30 Gy (3 Gy/day) intensity modulated radiotherapy boost was delivered (Total dose = 72 Gy in 31 fractions; EQD2 = 81 Gy, α/β = 1.4).
Thirty-three patients completed treatment and were followed for a median of 7.2 years (range, 1.2 - 9.5). Seven patients (21%) developed Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) late grade 2 GI toxicity and 1 patient (3%) developed late grade 2 GU toxicity. No patients developed late grade 3 GI or GU toxicity. To date, nine patients developed PSA relapse according to the Phoenix criteria. The actuarial five, seven and nine year biochemical control (BC) rates were 87% (95% confidence interval: 69-95), 77% (95% confidence interval: 56-89) and 66% (95% confidence interval: 42-82).
Our study demonstrates that the use of prostate fiducial markers in combination with a daily online image guidance protocol permits reduced, patient-specific PTV margins in a hypofractionated treatment scheme. This treatment planning and delivery strategy was well tolerated in the intermediate time frame. The use of very small PTV margins did not result in excessive failures when compared to other radiation regimens of similar radiobiological intensity.
这是一项前瞻性I期研究的最终报告,该研究评估了采用基于基准标记的每日图像引导策略和针对患者的小计划靶体积(PTV)边界进行大分割加量放疗的前列腺癌患者的可行性、毒性和生化控制情况。
低危和中危前列腺癌患者接受经会阴超声引导下植入三个金基准标记,并接受三维适形放疗,剂量为42 Gy(2 Gy/天)。在治疗的前九个分次期间,进行治疗前和治疗后的电子门静脉成像以计算分次内前列腺运动。得出针对患者的PTV边界,并给予30 Gy(3 Gy/天)的调强放疗加量(总剂量=72 Gy,分31次;等效剂量2=81 Gy,α/β=1.4)。
33例患者完成治疗,中位随访7.2年(范围1.2 - 9.5年)。7例患者(21%)出现放射治疗肿瘤学组(RTOG)2级晚期胃肠道毒性,1例患者(3%)出现2级晚期泌尿生殖系统毒性。无患者出现3级晚期胃肠道或泌尿生殖系统毒性。迄今为止,根据Phoenix标准,9例患者出现前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)复发。精算的5年、7年和9年生化控制(BC)率分别为87%(95%置信区间:69 - 95)、77%(95%置信区间:56 - 89)和66%(95%置信区间:42 - 82)。
我们的研究表明,在大分割治疗方案中,将前列腺基准标记与每日在线图像引导方案相结合可减少针对患者的PTV边界。这种治疗计划和实施策略在中期时间框架内耐受性良好。与其他具有相似放射生物学强度的放疗方案相比,使用非常小的PTV边界并未导致过多的失败情况。