Suppr超能文献

贝特曼原理在一种合作繁殖的鸟类中被逆转。

Bateman's principle is reversed in a cooperatively breeding bird.

作者信息

Apakupakul Kathleen, Rubenstein Dustin R

机构信息

Department of Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Biology, Columbia University, 1200 Amsterdam Avenue, New York, NY 10027, USA.

Department of Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Biology, Columbia University, 1200 Amsterdam Avenue, New York, NY 10027, USA

出版信息

Biol Lett. 2015 Apr;11(4):20150034. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2015.0034.

Abstract

Bateman's principle is not only used to explain sex differences in mating behaviour, but also to determine which sex has the greater opportunity for sexual selection. It predicts that the relationship between the number of mates and the number of offspring produced should be stronger for males than for females. Yet, it is unclear whether Bateman's principle holds in cooperatively breeding systems where the strength of selection on traits used in intrasexual competition is high in both sexes. We tested Bateman's principle in the cooperatively breeding superb starling (Lamprotornis superbus), finding that only females showed a significant, positive Bateman gradient. We also found that the opportunity for selection was on average higher in females, but that its strength and direction oscillated through time. These data are consistent with the hypothesis that sexual selection underlies the female trait elaboration observed in superb starlings and other cooperative breeders. Even though the Bateman gradient was steeper for females than for males, the year-to-year oscillation in the strength and direction of the opportunity for selection likely explains why cooperative breeders do not exhibit sexual role reversal. Thus, Bateman's principle may not hold in cooperative breeders where both sexes appear to be under mutually strong sexual selection.

摘要

贝特曼原理不仅用于解释交配行为中的性别差异,还用于确定哪种性别具有更大的性选择机会。它预测,配偶数量与后代数量之间的关系对雄性而言应比对雌性更强。然而,在合作繁殖系统中,两性用于同性竞争的性状上的选择强度都很高,贝特曼原理是否适用尚不清楚。我们在合作繁殖的壮丽辉椋鸟(Lamprotornis superbus)中测试了贝特曼原理,发现只有雌性呈现出显著的正向贝特曼梯度。我们还发现,平均而言雌性的选择机会更高,但其强度和方向会随时间波动。这些数据与如下假设一致:性选择是壮丽辉椋鸟及其他合作繁殖鸟类中观察到的雌性性状特化的基础。尽管雌性的贝特曼梯度比雄性更陡峭,但选择机会的强度和方向逐年波动,这可能解释了为什么合作繁殖鸟类没有出现性别角色反转。因此,在两性似乎都受到相互强烈性选择的合作繁殖鸟类中,贝特曼原理可能并不适用。

相似文献

2
The measure and significance of Bateman's principles.贝特曼原理的度量及意义。
Proc Biol Sci. 2014 Mar 19;281(1782):20132973. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2013.2973. Print 2014 May 7.
8
A reappraisal of Bateman's classic study of intrasexual selection.对贝特曼关于同性选择的经典研究的重新评估。
Evolution. 2007 Nov;61(11):2457-68. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00212.x. Epub 2007 Aug 23.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
ON THE MEASUREMENT OF NATURAL AND SEXUAL SELECTION: THEORY.论自然选择与性选择的度量:理论
Evolution. 1984 Jul;38(4):709-719. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1984.tb00344.x.
5
Sexual selection is a form of social selection.性选择是一种社会选择。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012 Aug 19;367(1600):2266-73. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0012.
9
Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila.果蝇的同性选择
Heredity (Edinb). 1948 Dec;2(Pt. 3):349-68. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1948.21.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验