1 Department of Medical Imaging, The Ottawa Hospital, The University of Ottawa, 1053 Carling Ave, Ottawa, ON K1Y 4E9, Canada.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 May;204(5):1013-23. doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.13279.
The objective of our study was to determine whether CT findings, including texture analysis, can differentiate sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma (RCC) from clear cell RCC.
A retrospective case-control study was performed of consecutive patients with a histologic diagnosis of sarcomatoid RCC (n = 20) and clear cell RCC (n = 25) who underwent preoperative CT over a 3-year period. The CT images were independently reviewed by two blinded abdominal radiologists; they evaluated the following: tumor heterogeneity, tumor margin, calcification, intratumoral neovascularity, peritumoral neovascularity, renal sinus invasion, renal vein invasion, and adjacent organ invasion. Interobserver agreement was assessed using the Cohen kappa coefficient, and results were compared between groups using an independent Student t test and the chi-square test with a Bonferroni correction. For texture analysis, gray-level co-occurrence and run-length matrix features were extracted and compared using Mann-Whitney U tests. ROC curves for each tumor were constructed, and AUCs were calculated.
Overall, sarcomatoid RCCs were larger than clear cell RCCs, measuring 77 ± 27 mm (mean ± SD) compared with 50 ± 29 mm (p = 0.003), respectively; however, there was no difference in tumor size between the tumors that were compared using texture analysis or subjective analysis (p = 0.06 and 0.03, respectively). From the subjective analysis, only peritumoral neovascularity (readers 1 and 2: 70% and 70% sarcomatoid RCCs vs 0% and 41.6% clear cell RCCs, respectively; p = 0.001) and the size of the peritumoral vessels (p < 0.001) differed between sarcomatoid RCCs and clear cell RCCs, and interobserver agreement was fair (κ = 0.38). Other subjective imaging features did not differ between the tumors (p > 0.005). There was greater run-length nonuniformity and greater gray-level nonuniformity in sarcomatoid RCCs than in clear cell RCCs (p = 0.03 and p = 0.04, respectively). The combined textural features identified sarcomatoid RCC with an AUC of 0.81 ± 0.08 (standard error) (p < 0.0001).
Large tumor size, the presence of peritumoral neovascularity, and larger peritumoral vessels are features that are more commonly associated with sarcomatoid RCCs than with clear cell RCCs. Sarcomatoid RCCs are also more heterogeneous by texture analysis than clear cell RCCs.
本研究旨在确定 CT 表现(包括纹理分析)是否可以区分肉瘤样肾细胞癌(RCC)与透明细胞 RCC。
对 3 年内连续接受组织学诊断为肉瘤样 RCC(n = 20)和透明细胞 RCC(n = 25)的患者进行了回顾性病例对照研究。两名盲法腹部放射科医生独立对 CT 图像进行了评估;他们评估了以下内容:肿瘤异质性、肿瘤边界、钙化、肿瘤内新生血管、肿瘤周围新生血管、肾盂侵犯、肾静脉侵犯和邻近器官侵犯。使用 Cohen kappa 系数评估观察者间一致性,并使用独立学生 t 检验和带有 Bonferroni 校正的卡方检验比较组间结果。对于纹理分析,提取灰度共生矩阵和游程长度矩阵特征,并使用 Mann-Whitney U 检验进行比较。为每个肿瘤构建 ROC 曲线,并计算 AUC。
总体而言,肉瘤样 RCC 比透明细胞 RCC 更大,分别为 77 ± 27 mm(均值 ± 标准差)和 50 ± 29 mm(p = 0.003);然而,使用纹理分析或主观分析比较的肿瘤大小没有差异(p = 0.06 和 0.03)。从主观分析来看,只有肿瘤周围新生血管(读者 1 和 2:70%和 70%的肉瘤样 RCC 与 0%和 41.6%的透明细胞 RCC 相比;p = 0.001)和肿瘤周围血管的大小(p < 0.001)在肉瘤样 RCC 和透明细胞 RCC 之间存在差异,观察者间一致性为中等(κ = 0.38)。其他主观成像特征在肿瘤之间没有差异(p > 0.005)。肉瘤样 RCC 的游程非均匀性和灰度非均匀性大于透明细胞 RCC(p = 0.03 和 p = 0.04)。联合纹理特征识别肉瘤样 RCC 的 AUC 为 0.81 ± 0.08(标准误差)(p < 0.0001)。
与透明细胞 RCC 相比,大肿瘤大小、肿瘤周围新生血管和较大的肿瘤周围血管是与肉瘤样 RCC 更相关的特征。肉瘤样 RCC 的纹理分析也比透明细胞 RCC 更具异质性。