O'Connor J A, O'Reilly B, Corcoran G D, O'Mahony J, Lucey B
Br J Biomed Sci. 2015;72(1):32-41. doi: 10.1080/09674845.2015.11666793.
The field of clinical microbiology has been revolutionised by genomic and proteomic methods, which have facilitated more rapid diagnosis and characterisation of infection in many cases. In contrast, mycobacteriological evolution has tended to retain the traditional methods of smear microscopy for detection of acid-fast bacilli to indicate mycobacteria, along with culture, and in synergy with more modern molecular methods. Thus, efforts have been focused on reducing the time to diagnosis of infection, while increasing the amount of diagnostic information available, including more definitive speciation, and more rapid susceptibility test results. Although smear microscopy remains a mainstay for the laboratory-based diagnosis of mycobacterial infection, molecular testing has vastly reduced the time needed for identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in particular, when compared with traditional culture-based techniques. Molecular methods may also yield antimicrobial susceptibility results through testing for the most common resistance-inducing mutations to some of the antimicrobial agents of choice. However, the diversity of resistance mutations already characterised suggests that these currently-available molecular detection systems should be accompanied by culture-based susceptibility testing. This review compares the efficacy of microscopic, phenotypic, proteomic and genotypic methods available for mycobacterial diagnosis. The diversity of methods currently in use reflects the complexity of this area of diagnostic microbiology.
基因组学和蛋白质组学方法给临床微生物学领域带来了变革,在许多情况下,这些方法有助于更快地诊断感染并对其进行特征描述。相比之下,分枝杆菌学的发展倾向于保留传统的涂片显微镜检查方法,用于检测抗酸杆菌以指示分枝杆菌,同时结合培养,并与更现代的分子方法协同使用。因此,人们致力于缩短感染诊断时间,同时增加可获得的诊断信息数量,包括更明确的菌种鉴定和更快的药敏试验结果。尽管涂片显微镜检查仍然是基于实验室的分枝杆菌感染诊断的主要手段,但与传统的基于培养的技术相比,分子检测尤其大大缩短了鉴定结核分枝杆菌所需的时间。分子方法还可以通过检测对某些首选抗菌药物最常见的耐药诱导突变来得出药敏结果。然而,已鉴定的耐药突变的多样性表明,这些目前可用的分子检测系统应辅以基于培养的药敏试验。本综述比较了可用于分枝杆菌诊断的显微镜检查、表型、蛋白质组学和基因分型方法的效果。目前使用的方法的多样性反映了诊断微生物学这一领域的复杂性。