Department of Nephrology, Hospital Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
Department of Nephrology, Hospital Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
J Ren Nutr. 2015 Sep;25(5):420-5. doi: 10.1053/j.jrn.2015.02.008. Epub 2015 Apr 20.
Dialysis machines use the Watson formula (Vwatson) to estimate the urea distribution volume (UDV) to calculate the online Kt/V for each dialysis session. However, the equation could give rise to inaccuracies. The present study analyzes whether body composition affects UDV estimated by Vwatson in comparison to bioimpedance spectroscopy (Vbis) as the reference method.
This is a transversal study performed in the setting of a hemodialysis unit.
Prevalent hemodialysis patients.
The same day, UDV was measured using Vwatson and Vbis. We compared their results.
Differences between UDV using Watson equation and Vbis.
We included 144 prevalent patients. Vwatson overestimated the volume with regard to Vbis (Vwatson - Vbis) by 2.5 L (1.8 L; P = .001). We found an excellent correlation between the 2 methods. A higher mean Vwatson - Vbis value was correlated to older age (P = .03), body mass index (P = .01), fat tissue index (P = .001), lower lean tissue index (P = .001), lower extracellular water (P = .01), and intracellular water (P = .001).
Body composition affects UDV estimated by Vwatson, thus modifying the result of Kt/V. In young patients who present more lean tissue and less fat tissue, Kt/V is underestimated with Vwatson.
透析机使用 Watson 公式(Vwatson)来估计尿素分布容积(UDV),以计算每次透析的在线 Kt/V。然而,该方程可能会导致不准确。本研究分析了身体成分是否会影响 Vwatson 估计的 UDV,与生物阻抗谱(Vbis)作为参考方法进行比较。
这是在血液透析单位中进行的横断面研究。
普遍的血液透析患者。
同一天,使用 Vwatson 和 Vbis 测量 UDV。我们比较了他们的结果。
使用 Watson 方程和 Vbis 测量的 UDV 之间的差异。
我们纳入了 144 名普遍存在的患者。Vwatson 高估了与 Vbis 的体积(Vwatson-Vbis)2.5 升(1.8 升;P =.001)。我们发现这两种方法之间有很好的相关性。较高的平均 Vwatson-Vbis 值与年龄较大(P =.03)、体重指数(P =.01)、脂肪组织指数(P =.001)、较低的瘦组织指数(P =.001)、较低的细胞外液(P =.01)和细胞内液(P =.001)相关。
身体成分会影响 Vwatson 估计的 UDV,从而改变 Kt/V 的结果。在年轻患者中,他们表现出更多的瘦组织和更少的脂肪组织,Vwatson 会低估 Kt/V。