Barquero Laura A, Sefcik Angela M, Cutting Laurie E, Rimrodt Sheryl L
Education and Brain Sciences Research Laboratory, Peabody School of Education, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Department of Special Education, Peabody School of Education, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2015 Dec;57(12):1150-8. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.12769. Epub 2015 Apr 22.
Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is a genetic disorder with a cognitive profile that includes visual-spatial perception deficits and a high incidence of reading disability. There is a paucity of information about how this cognitively complex population responds to mainstream reading interventions. The clinical trial goals were to determine whether children and adolescents with NF1 and reading deficits (NF+RD) benefit from mainstream remedial reading programs and whether responsiveness varies with differences in program-related visual-spatial demands.
Forty-nine participants (28 males, 21 females; aged 8-14y) with either NF+RD (n=17, 11 males, six females) or idiopathic reading deficit (IRD) (n=32, 17 males, 15 females) were randomly assigned to intensive remedial teaching using one of two multisensory reading programs: one with greater kinesthetic demands and the other with greater visual-spatial demands. Two control groups - wait-list IRD (n=14, 11 males, three females) and typically developing readers (n=26, 13 males, 13 females) - received no treatment. Repeated measures and multivariate ANOVA analyses compared each group's growth in reading achievement from pre- to post-testing.
Treated groups showed significant growth whereas untreated groups did not. Comparing treated groups, the IRD group responded equally well to both interventions, whereas the NF+RD group showed a better response to the more kinesthetic approach.
Results suggest that multisensory remedial reading teaching that emphasizes kinesthetic demands more than visual-spatial demands is suitable for students with NF+RD.
1型神经纤维瘤病(NF1)是一种遗传性疾病,其认知特征包括视觉空间感知缺陷和阅读障碍的高发病率。关于这一认知复杂群体对主流阅读干预措施的反应,目前信息匮乏。该临床试验的目的是确定患有NF1和阅读缺陷(NF+RD)的儿童和青少年是否能从主流阅读补救计划中受益,以及反应性是否会因与计划相关的视觉空间需求差异而有所不同。
49名参与者(28名男性,21名女性;年龄8 - 14岁),其中患有NF+RD的有17名(11名男性,6名女性),患有特发性阅读缺陷(IRD)的有32名(17名男性,15名女性),他们被随机分配接受两种多感官阅读计划之一的强化补救教学:一种对动觉要求较高,另一种对视觉空间要求较高。两个对照组——等待名单上的IRD组(14名,11名男性,3名女性)和发育正常的读者组(26名,13名男性,13名女性)——未接受任何治疗。重复测量和多变量方差分析比较了每组从测试前到测试后的阅读成绩增长情况。
接受治疗的组显示出显著增长,而未接受治疗的组则没有。比较接受治疗的组,IRD组对两种干预的反应同样良好,而NF+RD组对更强调动觉的方法反应更好。
结果表明,强调动觉需求而非视觉空间需求的多感官阅读补救教学适用于患有NF+RD的学生。