Suppr超能文献

用于缓解骨转移疼痛的多次分割放疗:20 Gy与30 Gy对比

Multifraction radiotherapy for palliation of painful bone metastases: 20 Gy versus 30 Gy.

作者信息

Valeriani Maurizio, Scaringi Claudia, Blasi Luciana, Carnevale Alessia, De Sanctis Vitaliana, Bonome Paolo, Bracci Stefano, Marrone Gianluca, Minniti Giuseppe, Enrici Riccardo Maurizi

机构信息

1Department of Radiation Oncology, Sant'Andrea Hospital, University "Sapienza", Rome - Italy.

出版信息

Tumori. 2015 May-Jun;101(3):318-22. doi: 10.5301/tj.5000286. Epub 2015 Apr 3.

Abstract

AIMS AND BACKGROUND

To compare 2 multifraction radiotherapy schedules in the palliation of painful bone metastases.

METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN

We retrospectively analyzed clinical data of 105 patients with a total of 140 painful bone metastases who were treated with 20 Gy in 5 fractions or 30 Gy in 10 fractions. The primary tumors were breast (30%), lung (28%), and prostate (14%). The main sites of irradiation were spine (n = 79) and sacrum or pelvis (n = 39). Pain was graded by patients according to the pain numeric rating scale just before and 1 month after radiotherapy. Pain progression was defined as an increase ≥2 on pain scale after an initial response.

RESULTS

The overall response rate at 1 month was 88.6%. Overall response rate was 89.6% in the 20-Gy arm and 87.3% in the 30-Gy arm (p = 0.669). The rate of complete response was statistically better in patients treated with 30 Gy (p = 0.019). The mean reduction in pain was 3.2 in the 20-Gy group and 3.6 in the 30-Gy group. Pain progression was 6.5% and 1.6%, respectively. The incidence of acute toxicity was statistically significantly higher in the 30-Gy arm (23.8%) than in the 20-Gy arm (2.6%) (p = 0.001). One pathologic fracture of the irradiated bone was observed in the 30-Gy arm. Two lesions, one in each group, were re-irradiated for pain recurrence. Pain progression was found in 6.5% of the irradiated lesions in the 20-Gy arm and in 1.6% in the 30-Gy arm.

CONCLUSIONS

In our series, both regimens achieved high rate of pain relief, although the group treated with higher total dose reported better complete response rate. The 30-Gy arm had a significantly higher rate of acute toxicity.

摘要

目的与背景

比较两种多分割放疗方案对疼痛性骨转移的姑息治疗效果。

方法与研究设计

我们回顾性分析了105例患者共140处疼痛性骨转移灶的临床资料,这些患者分别接受了5次分割共20 Gy或10次分割共30 Gy的放疗。原发肿瘤主要为乳腺癌(30%)、肺癌(28%)和前列腺癌(14%)。主要照射部位为脊柱(n = 79)和骶骨或骨盆(n = 39)。患者在放疗前及放疗后1个月根据疼痛数字评分量表对疼痛进行分级。疼痛进展定义为初始缓解后疼痛量表评分增加≥2分。

结果

1个月时的总缓解率为88.6%。20 Gy组的总缓解率为89.6%,30 Gy组为87.3%(p = 0.669)。接受30 Gy治疗的患者完全缓解率在统计学上更高(p = 0.019)。20 Gy组疼痛平均减轻3.2分,30 Gy组为3.6分。疼痛进展率分别为6.5%和1.6%。30 Gy组急性毒性发生率在统计学上显著高于20 Gy组(23.8%比2.6%)(p = 0.001)。30 Gy组观察到1例照射骨病理性骨折。两组各有1个病灶因疼痛复发接受了再次照射。20 Gy组照射病灶的疼痛进展率为6.5%,30 Gy组为1.6%。

结论

在我们的研究系列中,两种方案均实现了较高的疼痛缓解率,尽管总剂量较高的组完全缓解率更好。30 Gy组急性毒性发生率显著更高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验