Belani Chandra P, Fossella Frank
Lung and Thoracic Malignancies Program, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, PA 15232, USA.
Cancer. 2005 Dec 15;104(12):2766-74. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21495.
Controversy continues over whether elderly patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) should receive platinum-based chemotherapy. TAX 326 reported improved survival with docetaxel-cisplatin (DC) versus vinorelbine-cisplatin (VC) for advanced NSCLC. DC and docetaxel-carboplatin (DCb) were better tolerated than VC. We analyzed the efficacy and toxicity in patients ages < 65 and > or = 65 years.
Chemotherapy-naive, TNM Stage IIIB-IV NSCLC patients were randomized to DC (docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) and cisplatin 75 mg/m(2), d1 q3w), DCb (docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) and carboplatin area under the concentration-time curve 6 mg/mL.min, d1 q3w), or VC (vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2), d1, 8, 15, and 22 and cisplatin 100 mg/m(2), d1 q4w).
Of 1218 patients, 401 were age > or = 65 years (149/118/134 DC/DCb/VC arms). In the elderly, median survival was 12.6 versus 9.9 months, 1-year survival was 52% versus 41%, 2-year survival was 24% versus 17% for DC versus VC, respectively. DCb survival results were similar to those for VC: median, 9.0 months; 1-year, 38%; 2-year, 19%. Survival outcomes were similar between elderly and younger patients across treatment arms. Compared with younger patients, elderly patients reported moderately higher incidences of NCI CTC (version 1.0) Grade 3-4 asthenia, infection, and pulmonary toxicities across treatment arms, and diarrhea and sensory neurotoxicity for cisplatin-containing arms. Most hematologic toxicities occurred with similar incidences between elderly and younger patients, although neutropenia was slightly increased in elderly patients.
First-line docetaxel-cisplatin chemotherapy showed similar activity in elderly and younger patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC; elderly patients tolerated docetaxel-platinum well despite experiencing slightly more toxicity than younger patients.
老年晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者是否应接受铂类化疗仍存在争议。TAX 326研究报告称,对于晚期NSCLC,多西他赛 - 顺铂(DC)方案相较于长春瑞滨 - 顺铂(VC)方案可提高生存率。DC方案和多西他赛 - 卡铂(DCb)方案的耐受性优于VC方案。我们分析了年龄<65岁和≥65岁患者的疗效和毒性。
初治的TNM分期为IIIB - IV期的NSCLC患者被随机分为DC组(多西他赛75mg/m²和顺铂75mg/m²,第1天,每3周一次)、DCb组(多西他赛75mg/m²和卡铂曲线下面积6mg/mL·min,第1天,每3周一次)或VC组(长春瑞滨25mg/m²,第1、8、15和22天,顺铂100mg/m²,第1天,每4周一次)。
在1218例患者中,401例年龄≥65岁(DC组/DCb组/VC组分别为149/118/134例)。在老年患者中,DC方案与VC方案相比,中位生存期分别为12.6个月和9.9个月,1年生存率分别为52%和41%,2年生存率分别为24%和17%。DCb方案的生存结果与VC方案相似:中位生存期为9.0个月;1年生存率为38%;2年生存率为19%。各治疗组中,老年患者和年轻患者的生存结局相似。与年轻患者相比,各治疗组中,老年患者报告的美国国立癌症研究所常见毒性标准(CTC,第1.0版)3 - 4级乏力、感染和肺部毒性的发生率略高,含顺铂方案组的腹泻和感觉神经毒性发生率也略高。大多数血液学毒性在老年患者和年轻患者中的发生率相似,尽管老年患者的中性粒细胞减少症略有增加。
一线多西他赛 - 顺铂化疗在老年和年轻的晚期/转移性NSCLC患者中显示出相似的活性;老年患者对多西他赛 - 铂类方案耐受性良好,尽管其毒性比年轻患者略高。