Anzalone Andrea, Gabriel Manuela, Estrada Laura C, Gratton Enrico
Laboratory for Fluorescence Dynamics, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, United States of America.
Laboratory for Fluorescence Dynamics, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, United States of America; Centre for Bioactive Discovery in Health and Ageing, School of Science & Technology, University of New England, Armidale, Australia.
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 24;10(4):e0124975. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124975. eCollection 2015.
Metallic nanoparticles (NPs) are able to modify the excitation and emission rates (plasmonic enhancement) of fluorescent molecules in their close proximity. In this work, we measured the emission spectra of 20 nm Gold Nanoparticles (AuNPs) fixed on a glass surface submerged in a solution of different fluorophores using a spectral camera and 2-photon excitation. While on the glass surface, we observed the presence in the emission at least 3 components: i) second harmonic signal (SHG), ii) a broad emission from AuNPS and iii) fluorescence arising from fluorophores nearby. When on the glass surface, we found that the 3 spectral components have different relative intensities when the incident direction of linear polarization was changed indicating different physical origins for these components. Then we measured by fluctuation correlation spectroscopy (FCS) the scattering and fluorescence signal of the particles alone and in a solution of 100 nM EGFP using the spectral camera or measuring the scattering and fluorescence from the particles. We observed occasional fluorescence bursts when in the suspension we added fluorescent proteins. The spectrum of these burst was devoid of the SHG and of the broad emission in contrast to the signal collected from the gold nanoparticles on the glass surface. Instead we found that the spectrum during the burst corresponded closely to the spectrum of the fluorescent protein. An additional control was obtained by measuring the cross-correlation between the reflection from the particles and the fluorescence arising from EGFP both excited at 488 nm. We found a very weak cross-correlation between the AuNPs and the fluorescence confirming that the burst originate from a few particles with a fluorescence signal.
金属纳米颗粒(NPs)能够改变其附近荧光分子的激发和发射速率(等离子体增强)。在这项工作中,我们使用光谱相机和双光子激发测量了固定在浸没于不同荧光团溶液中的玻璃表面上的20纳米金纳米颗粒(AuNPs)的发射光谱。在玻璃表面时,我们观察到发射中至少存在3种成分:i)二次谐波信号(SHG),ii)来自AuNPs的宽发射,以及iii)附近荧光团产生的荧光。当在玻璃表面时,我们发现当线性偏振的入射方向改变时,这3种光谱成分具有不同的相对强度,表明这些成分具有不同的物理起源。然后,我们通过波动相关光谱法(FCS),使用光谱相机测量单独的颗粒以及在100 nM增强型绿色荧光蛋白(EGFP)溶液中的颗粒的散射和荧光信号,或者测量颗粒的散射和荧光。当我们在悬浮液中添加荧光蛋白时,我们观察到偶尔的荧光猝发。与从玻璃表面的金纳米颗粒收集的信号相比,这些猝发的光谱没有SHG和宽发射。相反,我们发现猝发期间的光谱与荧光蛋白的光谱非常接近。通过测量在488 nm激发的颗粒反射与EGFP产生的荧光之间的交叉相关性,获得了额外的对照。我们发现AuNPs与荧光之间的交叉相关性非常弱,证实猝发源自少数具有荧光信号的颗粒。