• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在良性贲门狭窄模型中,临时置入紫杉醇或雷帕霉素洗脱支架可有效减轻支架置入引起的炎症反应和瘢痕形成。

Temporary placement of a paclitaxel or rapamycin-eluting stent is effective to reduce stenting induced inflammatory reaction and scaring in benign cardia stricture models.

作者信息

Wang Lin, Zhu Yue-Qi, Cheng Ying-Sheng, Cui Wen-Guo, Chen Ni-Wei

机构信息

Department of Radiology, The Tenth Affiliated People's Hospital, Shanghai Tong Ji University Faculty of Medicine, Shanghai, China; Department of Radiology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital600 Yi Shan Road, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Turk J Gastroenterol. 2014 Dec;25 Suppl 1:69-74. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2014.6611.

DOI:10.5152/tjg.2014.6611
PMID:25910372
Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To investigate whether temporary placement of a paclitaxel or rapamycin eluting stent is more effective to reduce stenting induced inflammatory reaction and scaring than a bared stent in benign cardia stricture models.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eighty dog models of stricture were randomly divided into a control group (CG, n=20, no stent insertion), a bare stent group (BSG, n=20), a paclitaxel eluting (Pacl-ESG, n=20) and a rapamycin eluting stent group (Rapa-ESG, n=20), with one-week stent retention. Lower-oesophageal-sphincter pressure (LOSP), 5-minute barium height (5-mBH) and cardia diameter were assessed before, immediately after the procedure, and regularly for 6 months. Five dogs in each group were euthanized for histological examination at each follow-up assessment.

RESULTS

Stent insertion was well tolerated, with similar migration rates in three groups. At 6 months, LOSP and 5-mBH improved in Pacl-ESG and Rapa-ESG compared to BSG (p<0.05), with no difference between Pacl-ESG and Rapa-ESG (p>0.05). Cardia kept more patency in the Pacl-ESG and Rapa-ESG than in BSG (p<0.05). Reduced peak inflammatory reactions and scarring occurred in the Pacl-ESG and Rapa-ESG compared to BSG (p<0.05), with a similar outcome in the Pacl-ESG and Rapa-ESG (p>0.05).

CONCLUSION

Paclitaxel or rapamycin-eluting stents insertion led to better outcomes than bare stents in benign cardia stricture models.

摘要

背景/目的:在良性贲门狭窄模型中,研究临时置入紫杉醇或雷帕霉素洗脱支架在减轻支架置入引起的炎症反应和瘢痕形成方面是否比裸支架更有效。

材料与方法

80只犬狭窄模型随机分为对照组(CG,n = 20,未置入支架)、裸支架组(BSG,n = 20)、紫杉醇洗脱支架组(Pacl - ESG,n = 20)和雷帕霉素洗脱支架组(Rapa - ESG,n = 20),支架保留1周。在术前、术后即刻及术后6个月定期评估食管下括约肌压力(LOSP)、5分钟钡剂高度(5 - mBH)和贲门直径。每组在每次随访评估时处死5只犬进行组织学检查。

结果

支架置入耐受性良好,三组的移位率相似。6个月时,与BSG相比,Pacl - ESG和Rapa - ESG组的LOSP和5 - mBH有所改善(p < 0.05),Pacl - ESG和Rapa - ESG组之间无差异(p > 0.05)。与BSG相比,Pacl - ESG和Rapa - ESG组的贲门保持更通畅(p < 0.05)。与BSG相比,Pacl - ESG和Rapa - ESG组的峰值炎症反应和瘢痕形成减少(p < 0.05),Pacl - ESG和Rapa - ESG组结果相似(p > 0.05)。

结论

在良性贲门狭窄模型中,置入紫杉醇或雷帕霉素洗脱支架比裸支架效果更好。

相似文献

1
Temporary placement of a paclitaxel or rapamycin-eluting stent is effective to reduce stenting induced inflammatory reaction and scaring in benign cardia stricture models.在良性贲门狭窄模型中,临时置入紫杉醇或雷帕霉素洗脱支架可有效减轻支架置入引起的炎症反应和瘢痕形成。
Turk J Gastroenterol. 2014 Dec;25 Suppl 1:69-74. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2014.6611.
2
Biodegradable rapamycin-eluting nano-fiber membrane-covered metal stent placement to reduce fibroblast proliferation in experimental stricture in a canine model.可生物降解雷帕霉素洗脱纳米纤维膜覆盖金属支架置入减少犬模型实验性狭窄中纤维母细胞增殖。
Endoscopy. 2013 Jun;45(6):458-68. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1326399. Epub 2013 Apr 11.
3
Evaluation of biodegradable paclitaxel-eluting nanofibre-covered metal stents for the treatment of benign cardia stricture in an experimental model.评价生物可降解紫杉醇洗脱纳米纤维覆盖金属支架治疗实验性良性贲门狭窄的疗效。
Br J Surg. 2013 May;100(6):784-93. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9106.
4
Temporary self-expanding cardia stents for the treatment of achalasia: an experimental study in dogs.临时自膨式贲门支架治疗贲门失弛缓症:犬实验研究。
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2010 Nov;22(11):1240-7, e321-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2010.01573.x.
5
A highly flexible paclitaxel-loaded poly(ε-caprolactone) electrospun fibrous-membrane-covered stent for benign cardia stricture.用于良性贲门狭窄的载紫杉醇的高弹性聚己内酯电纺纤维膜覆盖支架。
Acta Biomater. 2013 Sep;9(9):8328-36. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.06.004. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
6
Tissue hyperplasia: influence of a paclitaxel-eluting covered stent--preliminary study in a canine urethral model.组织增生:紫杉醇洗脱覆膜支架的影响——犬尿道模型的初步研究
Radiology. 2005 Feb;234(2):438-44. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2342040006.
7
Clinical outcomes after sirolimus-eluting, paclitaxel-eluting, and bare metal stents (from the first phase of the prospective multicenter German DES.DE Registry).西罗莫司洗脱支架、紫杉醇洗脱支架和裸金属支架置入后的临床结局(来自前瞻性多中心德国DES.DE注册研究的第一阶段)
Am J Cardiol. 2009 Nov 15;104(10):1362-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.06.058. Epub 2009 Sep 26.
8
Comparative healing response after sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation in a pig model of restenosis.西罗莫司洗脱支架与紫杉醇洗脱支架植入猪再狭窄模型后的愈合反应比较
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 May 1;73(6):801-8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21879.
9
Everolimus-eluting stents compared with paclitaxel-eluting stents for treatment of coronary in-stent restenoses.依维莫司洗脱支架与紫杉醇洗脱支架治疗冠状动脉支架内再狭窄的比较。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2012 Nov-Dec;13(6):307-10. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2012.09.003.
10
Polymer-free sirolimus-eluting versus polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting stents: an individual patient data analysis of randomized trials.无聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架与含聚合物紫杉醇洗脱支架的比较:随机试验的个体患者数据分析
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2013 Jun;66(6):435-42. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2012.11.016. Epub 2013 Apr 11.

引用本文的文献

1
A Review of Self-Expanding Esophageal Stents for the Palliation Therapy of Inoperable Esophageal Malignancies.不可切除食管癌姑息治疗中自膨式食管支架的综述
Biomed Res Int. 2019 Apr 4;2019:9265017. doi: 10.1155/2019/9265017. eCollection 2019.
2
History of the Use of Esophageal Stent in Management of Dysphagia and Its Improvement Over the Years.食管支架在吞咽困难管理中的应用历史及其多年来的改进
Dysphagia. 2017 Feb;32(1):39-49. doi: 10.1007/s00455-017-9781-7. Epub 2017 Jan 18.