• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者对切除并丢弃模式的偏好。

Patient preferences of a resect and discard paradigm.

作者信息

Vu Hongha T, Sayuk Gregory S, Gupta Neil, Hollander Thomas, Kim Aram, Early Dayna S

机构信息

Washington University School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri.

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Aug;82(2):381-384.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.01.042. Epub 2015 Apr 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2015.01.042
PMID:25910663
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Resect and discard is a new paradigm for management of diminutive polyps. It is unknown whether patients will embrace this new paradigm in which small polyps would not be sent for histopathologic review.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether patients would be willing to pay for pathology costs with their own money and which factors influence patients' decisions to pay or not pay for pathology costs with their own money.

DESIGN

Single-center, prospective, survey study.

SETTING

Hospital outpatient endoscopy center.

PATIENTS

Adults undergoing colonoscopy for screening or routine polyp surveillance.

INTERVENTIONS

Patient survey.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Willingness to pay out-of-pocket for pathology costs when a diminutive polyp is found and factors that influence patients' decisions to pay or not pay for pathology costs with their own money.

RESULTS

A total of 500 participants completed the survey. A total of 360 respondents (71.9%) indicated a hypothetical willingness to pay out-of-pocket for histopathologic polyp analysis if this interpretation was not covered by insurance. Patient factors significantly associated with willingness to pay for polyp analysis included higher income and education and female sex.

LIMITATIONS

Single center, hypothetical situation.

CONCLUSION

Over two-thirds of patients were willing to pay to have their diminutive polyp sent for pathologic evaluation if their insurance carrier would not pay the cost. Factors associated with willingness to pay included higher income, higher education, and female sex. Patients who were unwilling to pay raised concerns about cost and are less concerned about cancer risk compared with those willing to pay. (

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02305251.).

摘要

背景

切除并丢弃是微小息肉管理的一种新范式。尚不清楚患者是否会接受这种不将小息肉送去进行组织病理学检查的新范式。

目的

确定患者是否愿意自费支付病理检查费用,以及哪些因素会影响患者自费支付或不支付病理检查费用的决定。

设计

单中心、前瞻性调查研究。

地点

医院门诊内镜中心。

患者

接受结肠镜筛查或常规息肉监测的成年人。

干预措施

患者调查。

主要观察指标

发现微小息肉时自费支付病理检查费用的意愿,以及影响患者自费支付或不支付病理检查费用决定的因素。

结果

共有500名参与者完成了调查。共有360名受访者(71.9%)表示,如果保险不涵盖此项检查,他们假设愿意自费进行息肉组织病理学分析。与支付息肉分析费用意愿显著相关的患者因素包括较高的收入、教育程度以及女性性别。

局限性

单中心、假设情况。

结论

如果保险公司不支付费用,超过三分之二的患者愿意自费将其微小息肉送去进行病理评估。与支付意愿相关的因素包括较高的收入、较高的教育程度以及女性性别。与愿意支付的患者相比,不愿意支付的患者对费用表示担忧,而对癌症风险的担忧较少。(临床试验注册号:NCT02305251。)

相似文献

1
Patient preferences of a resect and discard paradigm.患者对切除并丢弃模式的偏好。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Aug;82(2):381-384.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.01.042. Epub 2015 Apr 22.
2
A survey of patient acceptance of resect and discard for diminutive polyps.一项关于患者对微小息肉切除并丢弃的接受度的调查。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Aug;82(2):376-380.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.04.029. Epub 2015 Jun 9.
3
Patients' willingness to defer resection of diminutive polyps: results of a multicenter survey.患者愿意推迟切除微小息肉:一项多中心调查的结果。
Endoscopy. 2018 Mar;50(3):221-229. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-121221. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
4
Diminutive polyp cancers and the DISCARD strategy: Much ado about nothing or the end of the affair?
Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Aug;82(2):385-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.02.036.
5
Current management of diminutive colorectal polyps in Taiwan.台湾地区微小结直肠息肉的处理现状。
Dig Endosc. 2014 Apr;26 Suppl 2:64-7. doi: 10.1111/den.12260.
6
Current status and future perspectives of endoscopic diagnosis and treatment of diminutive colorectal polyps.微小结直肠息肉的内镜诊断和治疗的现状与展望。
Dig Endosc. 2014 Apr;26 Suppl 2:104-8. doi: 10.1111/den.12281.
7
Prevalence of advanced histological features in diminutive and small colon polyps.小和微小结肠息肉中高级组织学特征的流行率。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 May;75(5):1022-30. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.01.020. Epub 2012 Mar 9.
8
Clinicopathological features of colorectal polyps: evaluation of the 'predict, resect and discard' strategies.结直肠息肉的临床病理特征:“预测、切除和丢弃”策略的评估。
Colorectal Dis. 2013 Jun;15(6):e295-300. doi: 10.1111/codi.12210.
9
Diminutive polyps among black and Latino populations undergoing screening colonoscopy: evidence supporting a resect and discard approach.筛查性结肠镜检查中黑人和拉丁裔人群中的微小息肉:支持切除和丢弃方法的证据。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Mar;81(3):728-32. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.11.036.
10
A prospective dual-center proof-of-principle study evaluating the incremental benefit of narrow-band imaging with a fixed zoom function in real-time prediction of polyp histology. Can we resect and discard?一项前瞻性双中心原理验证研究,评估具有固定变焦功能的窄带成像在息肉组织学实时预测中的增量效益。我们可以切除并丢弃吗?
Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Aug;82(2):362-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.01.014. Epub 2015 Apr 1.

引用本文的文献

1
A systematic review of questionnaires about patient's values and preferences in clinical practice guidelines.关于临床实践指南中患者价值观和偏好问卷的系统评价。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018 Nov 2;12:2309-2323. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S177540. eCollection 2018.