Bhadange Yogesh, Das Sujata, Kasav Mahesh K, Sahu Srikant K, Sharma Savitri
Cornea and Anterior Segment Service, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Ocular Microbiology Service, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Br J Ophthalmol. 2015 Nov;99(11):1498-502. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-306414. Epub 2015 Apr 24.
To determine the causes of culture negativity and compare clinical outcomes in patients with culture-negative (CN) keratitis versus culture-positive (CP) keratitis.
Medical and microbiology records of 60 patients, who presented at the L V Prasad Eye Institute, Bhubaneswar, between January 2009 and December 2010, and who were clinically diagnosed to have microbial keratitis were retrospectively reviewed. Detailed ocular examination was performed before corneal scraping was sent for microbiological workup. The data collected from each record included age, gender, predisposing factors (ocular and systemic), clinical presentation, management and outcome of treatment.
The duration of symptoms and prior use of topical medication was significantly higher in the CN group (p=0.005, p=0.007, respectively). Infiltrate size (p=0.42) and history of ocular trauma (p=0.14) had no association. While patients in the CP group underwent 9 (30%) minor major surgical procedures and 14 (46.7%) major surgical procedures, patients in the CN group underwent 11 (36.7%) minor surgical procedures and 1 (3.3%) major surgical procedure. Success in treatment was achieved in 27 (90%) and 25 (83.3%) patients in CP and CN groups, respectively. The mean visual acuity (logMAR) at presentation in the CP group was 2.53 which improved to 1.83 at the last follow-up (p=0.0001). Similarly, the mean visual acuity (logMAR) at presentation in the CN group was 2.57 which marginally improved to 2.34 at the last follow-up (p=0.03).
CN keratitis is associated with long duration of topical medication. The number of major surgical interventions in CN keratitis is significantly less compared with CP keratitis. However, the final outcome of treatment is similar in both CP and CN keratitis.
确定培养阴性的原因,并比较培养阴性(CN)角膜炎患者与培养阳性(CP)角膜炎患者的临床结局。
回顾性分析2009年1月至2010年12月在布巴内斯瓦尔的L V普拉萨德眼科研究所就诊、临床诊断为微生物性角膜炎的60例患者的医学和微生物学记录。在角膜刮片送检进行微生物学检查之前,进行了详细的眼部检查。从每份记录中收集的数据包括年龄、性别、易感因素(眼部和全身)、临床表现、治疗管理及治疗结果。
CN组的症状持续时间和局部用药史显著更长(分别为p=0.005,p=0.007)。浸润大小(p=0.42)和眼外伤史(p=0.14)无相关性。CP组患者接受了9例(30%)小/大手术,14例(46.7%)大手术,而CN组患者接受了11例(36.7%)小手术和1例(3.3%)大手术。CP组和CN组分别有27例(90%)和25例(83.3%)患者治疗成功。CP组就诊时的平均视力(logMAR)为2.53,最后一次随访时提高到1.83(p=0.0001)。同样,CN组就诊时的平均视力(logMAR)为2.57,最后一次随访时略有提高至2.34(p=0.03)。
CN角膜炎与局部用药时间长有关。与CP角膜炎相比,CN角膜炎的大手术干预次数明显较少。然而,CP和CN角膜炎的最终治疗结果相似。