Department of Vascular Surgery, St. Franziskus Hospital and University Clinic of Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
Department of Vascular Surgery, St. Franziskus Hospital and University Clinic of Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015 Jul;50(1):60-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2015.03.023. Epub 2015 Apr 23.
OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: Bridging stent grafts (BSGs) are used to connect the target vessel with the main body during fenestrated or branched aortic endografting (f/bEVAR). No dedicated devices are available for BSG. The aims of this study were to assess the performance of BSGs.
Between January 2004 and May 2014 the data of patients treated with f/bEVAR were prospectively collected. Only patients treated after January 2010 were included. The main measurement outcome was any BSG related complications. A logistic regression analysis, including target vessel type, type of joint (fenestration or cuff), and type of BSG identified potential risk factors.
One hundred and fifty consecutive patients underwent f/bEVAR, and 523 target vessels were involved. These included 104 celiac, 140 superior mesenteric, 275 renal, and four other arteries. The technical success rate was 99% (520/523 target vessels). Balloon expandable BSGs were mainly used (n = 494; 95%), and in 336 (65%) relining stents were combined. The primary reasons for technical failure were the dislocation of the main body (n = 1) and unsuccessful cannulation (n = 2). One was revascularized by means of the periscope technique. Four target vessel injuries were recorded and four renal arteries occluded peri-operatively. After a median follow up of 14 months (interquartile range 5.5-23.0), 13 (2%) BSGs occluded and 19 (4%) required re-interventions. Two SMA occlusions occurred, leading to death in both patients. The patency and freedom from re-intervention rates at 3 years amounted to 85% and 91%, respectively. Use of a branched main body was the only independent risk factor for re-intervention and for the composite event (hazard ratio [HR] 3.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3-9.9 [p = .02]; and HR 2.8, 95% CI 1.2-7.0 [p < .01], respectively). Of note, the use of relining stents seemed not to prevent BSG related complications.
The currently used BSGs had low occlusion and re-intervention rates. Modifications of the branched design or dedicated BSG devices may improve outcome, especially after bEVAR.
目的/背景:在开窗或分支主动脉腔内修复术(fenestrated or branched aortic endografting,f/bEVAR)中,使用覆膜支架移植物(bridging stent grafts,BSGs)将靶血管与主体连接起来。目前尚无专用的 BSG 设备。本研究旨在评估 BSG 的性能。
2004 年 1 月至 2014 年 5 月期间前瞻性收集接受 f/bEVAR 治疗的患者数据。仅纳入 2010 年 1 月后接受治疗的患者。主要测量结果是任何与 BSG 相关的并发症。使用逻辑回归分析,包括靶血管类型、连接方式(开窗或袖口)和 BSG 类型,确定潜在的危险因素。
150 例连续患者接受了 f/bEVAR 治疗,涉及 523 个靶血管。其中 104 例为腹腔干动脉,140 例为肠系膜上动脉,275 例为肾动脉,4 例为其他动脉。技术成功率为 99%(520/523 个靶血管)。主要使用球囊扩张式 BSG(n=494;95%),336 例(65%)联合使用覆膜支架。技术失败的主要原因是主体脱位(n=1)和导管插入不成功(n=2)。1 例通过望远镜技术再血管化。记录到 4 例靶血管损伤和 4 例肾动脉术中闭塞。中位随访 14 个月(四分位距 5.5-23.0)后,13 例(2%)BSG 闭塞,19 例(4%)需要再次介入治疗。2 例 SMA 闭塞,导致 2 例患者死亡。3 年时的通畅率和免于再次干预的率分别为 85%和 91%。使用分支主体是再次干预和复合事件的唯一独立危险因素(风险比[HR]3.5,95%置信区间[CI]1.3-9.9[P=0.02];HR 2.8,95%CI 1.2-7.0[P<.01])。值得注意的是,使用覆膜支架似乎并不能预防 BSG 相关并发症。
目前使用的 BSG 闭塞和再次干预的发生率较低。分支设计或专用 BSG 设备的改进可能会改善结果,尤其是在 bEVAR 后。