Suppr超能文献

覆膜支架移植物在腔内隔绝和分支主动脉腔内修复术中的应用效果。

Performance of Bridging Stent Grafts in Fenestrated and Branched Aortic Endografting.

机构信息

Department of Vascular Surgery, St. Franziskus Hospital and University Clinic of Muenster, Muenster, Germany.

Department of Vascular Surgery, St. Franziskus Hospital and University Clinic of Muenster, Muenster, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015 Jul;50(1):60-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2015.03.023. Epub 2015 Apr 23.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: Bridging stent grafts (BSGs) are used to connect the target vessel with the main body during fenestrated or branched aortic endografting (f/bEVAR). No dedicated devices are available for BSG. The aims of this study were to assess the performance of BSGs.

METHODS

Between January 2004 and May 2014 the data of patients treated with f/bEVAR were prospectively collected. Only patients treated after January 2010 were included. The main measurement outcome was any BSG related complications. A logistic regression analysis, including target vessel type, type of joint (fenestration or cuff), and type of BSG identified potential risk factors.

RESULTS

One hundred and fifty consecutive patients underwent f/bEVAR, and 523 target vessels were involved. These included 104 celiac, 140 superior mesenteric, 275 renal, and four other arteries. The technical success rate was 99% (520/523 target vessels). Balloon expandable BSGs were mainly used (n = 494; 95%), and in 336 (65%) relining stents were combined. The primary reasons for technical failure were the dislocation of the main body (n = 1) and unsuccessful cannulation (n = 2). One was revascularized by means of the periscope technique. Four target vessel injuries were recorded and four renal arteries occluded peri-operatively. After a median follow up of 14 months (interquartile range 5.5-23.0), 13 (2%) BSGs occluded and 19 (4%) required re-interventions. Two SMA occlusions occurred, leading to death in both patients. The patency and freedom from re-intervention rates at 3 years amounted to 85% and 91%, respectively. Use of a branched main body was the only independent risk factor for re-intervention and for the composite event (hazard ratio [HR] 3.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3-9.9 [p = .02]; and HR 2.8, 95% CI 1.2-7.0 [p < .01], respectively). Of note, the use of relining stents seemed not to prevent BSG related complications.

CONCLUSION

The currently used BSGs had low occlusion and re-intervention rates. Modifications of the branched design or dedicated BSG devices may improve outcome, especially after bEVAR.

摘要

目的/背景:在开窗或分支主动脉腔内修复术(fenestrated or branched aortic endografting,f/bEVAR)中,使用覆膜支架移植物(bridging stent grafts,BSGs)将靶血管与主体连接起来。目前尚无专用的 BSG 设备。本研究旨在评估 BSG 的性能。

方法

2004 年 1 月至 2014 年 5 月期间前瞻性收集接受 f/bEVAR 治疗的患者数据。仅纳入 2010 年 1 月后接受治疗的患者。主要测量结果是任何与 BSG 相关的并发症。使用逻辑回归分析,包括靶血管类型、连接方式(开窗或袖口)和 BSG 类型,确定潜在的危险因素。

结果

150 例连续患者接受了 f/bEVAR 治疗,涉及 523 个靶血管。其中 104 例为腹腔干动脉,140 例为肠系膜上动脉,275 例为肾动脉,4 例为其他动脉。技术成功率为 99%(520/523 个靶血管)。主要使用球囊扩张式 BSG(n=494;95%),336 例(65%)联合使用覆膜支架。技术失败的主要原因是主体脱位(n=1)和导管插入不成功(n=2)。1 例通过望远镜技术再血管化。记录到 4 例靶血管损伤和 4 例肾动脉术中闭塞。中位随访 14 个月(四分位距 5.5-23.0)后,13 例(2%)BSG 闭塞,19 例(4%)需要再次介入治疗。2 例 SMA 闭塞,导致 2 例患者死亡。3 年时的通畅率和免于再次干预的率分别为 85%和 91%。使用分支主体是再次干预和复合事件的唯一独立危险因素(风险比[HR]3.5,95%置信区间[CI]1.3-9.9[P=0.02];HR 2.8,95%CI 1.2-7.0[P<.01])。值得注意的是,使用覆膜支架似乎并不能预防 BSG 相关并发症。

结论

目前使用的 BSG 闭塞和再次干预的发生率较低。分支设计或专用 BSG 设备的改进可能会改善结果,尤其是在 bEVAR 后。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验