Oikonomou Nikolaos, Tountas Yannis, Mariolis Argiris, Souliotis Kyriakos, Athanasakis Kostas, Kyriopoulos John
Health Centre of Gennadi, South Rhodes, 85109, Greece.
Greek Union of General Practitioners, Athens, Greece.
Health Care Manag Sci. 2016 Dec;19(4):313-325. doi: 10.1007/s10729-015-9324-4. Epub 2015 Apr 26.
This is a study to measure the efficiency of the rural Health Centres (HCs) and their Regional Surgeries (RSs) of the 6th Health Prefecture (HP) of Greece, which covers Southern and Western Greece. Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) was applied under Constant and Variable Returns to Scale, using a weight-restricted, output-oriented model, to calculate pure technical efficiency (PΤΕ), scale efficiency (SE) and total technical efficiency (TE). The selection of inputs, outputs and their relative weights in the model was based on two consecutive consensus panels of experts on Primary Health Care (PHC). Medical personnel, nursing personnel and technological equipment were chosen as inputs and were attributed appropriate weight restrictions. Acute, chronic and preventive consultations where chosen as outputs; each output was constructed by smaller subcategories of different relative importance. Data were collected through a questionnaire sent to all HCs of the covered area. From the 42 HCs which provided complete data, the study identified 9 as technical efficient, 5 as scale efficient and 2 as total efficient. The mean TE, PTE and SE scores of the HCs of the 6th Health Prefecture were 0.57, 0.67 and 0.87, respectively. The results demonstrate noteworthy variation in efficiency in the productive process of the HCs of Southern and Western Greece. The dominant form of inefficiency was technical inefficiency. The HCs of the 6th HP can theoretically produce 33 % more output on average, using their current production factors. These results indicated potential for considerable efficiency improvement in most rural health care units. Emphasis on prevention and chronic disease management, as well as wider structural and organisational reforms, are discussed from the viewpoint of how to increase efficiency.
这是一项针对希腊第六健康专区农村健康中心(HC)及其区域外科(RS)效率的研究,该专区覆盖希腊南部和西部。采用数据包络分析(DEA),在规模报酬不变和可变的情况下,使用权重受限、以产出为导向的模型,计算纯技术效率(PTE)、规模效率(SE)和总技术效率(TE)。模型中输入、输出及其相对权重的选择基于两届初级卫生保健(PHC)专家共识小组的意见。选择医务人员、护理人员和技术设备作为输入,并赋予适当的权重限制。选择急性、慢性和预防性会诊作为输出;每个输出由不同相对重要性的较小子类别构成。通过向覆盖地区的所有健康中心发送问卷来收集数据。在提供完整数据的42个健康中心中,该研究确定9个为技术有效,5个为规模有效,2个为完全有效。第六健康专区健康中心的TE、PTE和SE平均得分分别为0.57、0.67和0.87。结果表明,希腊南部和西部健康中心的生产过程效率存在显著差异。效率低下的主要形式是技术效率低下。第六健康专区的健康中心理论上平均可以利用其当前生产要素多产出33%。这些结果表明大多数农村医疗单位有大幅提高效率的潜力。从提高效率的角度讨论了对预防和慢性病管理的重视,以及更广泛的结构和组织改革。