Garbagnati F, Lutman R, Valvassori L, Marchianó A, Bellegotti L
Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milano.
Eur J Radiol. 1989 Nov;9(4):214-6.
The aim of the present paper is to distinguish between thoracic pulmonary needle biopsy--which can be carried out under fluoroscopic guidance--and thoracic extrapulmonary needle biopsy, which requires a more accurate type of guidance, such as CT. Among the 500 thoracic punctures performed during the last 5 years, we considered only 90 biopsies of mediastinal (N = 58) or thoracic wall (N = 32) masses. We have thus excluded all parenchymal lesions of the lungs. For extrapulmonary thoracic masses, CT was the method of choice for biopsy guidance which provided diagnostic evidence of small-diameter mediastinal lesions that permitted analysis of the relationship to vascular structures and performance of extrapleural needle insertion, using larger-gauge needles to ensure accurate needle placement within the lesion. In both mediastinal and thoracic wall lesions an overall accuracy rate of 84% was obtained. In no case was thoracic drainage required for treatment of the moderate degree of pneumothorax that occurred in 1% of our patient population.
