Sase Sunetra, Sase Ajinkya, Sialana Fernando J, Gröger Marion, Bennett Keiryn L, Stork Oliver, Lubec Gert, Li Lin
Department of Pediatrics, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.
CeMM Research Center for Molecular Medicine of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna, Austria.
Hippocampus. 2015 Dec;25(12):1501-16. doi: 10.1002/hipo.22470. Epub 2015 Jul 14.
In contextual fear conditioning (CFC), the use of pharmacological and lesion approaches has helped to understand that there are differential roles for the dorsal hippocampus (DH) and the ventral hippocampus (VH) in the acquisition, consolidation and retrieval phases. Concomitant analysis of the DH and the VH in individual phases with respect to α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionate receptors and N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor subtype N1 (GluN1)-containing complexes (RCC) and subunits has not been reported so far. Herein, CFC was performed in mice that were euthanized at different time points. DH and VH samples were taken for the determination of RCC and subunit levels using BN- and SDS-PAGE, respectively, with subsequent Western blotting. Evaluation of spine densities, morphology, and immunohistochemistry of GluA1 and GluA2 was performed. In the acquisition phase levels of GluA1-RCC and subunits in VH were increased. In the consolidation phase GluA1- and GluA2-RCC levels were increased in DH and VH, while both receptor subunit levels were increased in the VH only. In the retrieval phase GluA1-RCC, subunits thereof and GluA2-RCC were increased in DH and VH, whereas GluA2 subunits were increased in the VH only. GluN1-RCC levels were increased in acquisition and consolidation phase, while subunit levels in the acquisition phase were increased only in the DH. The immunohistochemical studies in the individual phases in subareas of hippocampus supported immunochemical changes of GluA1 and GluA2 RCC's. Dendritic spine densities and the prevalence of thin spines in the acquisition phase of VH and mushroom spines in the retrieval phase of the VH and DH were increased. The findings from the current study suggest different receptor and receptor complex patterns in the individual phases in CFC and in DH and VH. The results propose that different RCCs are formed in the individual phases and that VH and DH may be involved in CFC.
在情境恐惧条件反射(CFC)中,药理学和损伤方法的运用有助于人们了解背侧海马体(DH)和腹侧海马体(VH)在习得、巩固和提取阶段具有不同作用。到目前为止,尚未有关于在各个阶段对DH和VH中α-氨基-3-羟基-5-甲基-4-异恶唑丙酸受体以及含N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸受体亚型N1(GluN1)的复合物(RCC)和亚基进行同步分析的报道。在此,对在不同时间点实施安乐死的小鼠进行了CFC实验。分别采集DH和VH样本,使用蓝色天然聚丙烯酰胺凝胶电泳(BN-PAGE)和十二烷基硫酸钠聚丙烯酰胺凝胶电泳(SDS-PAGE)测定RCC和亚基水平,随后进行蛋白质免疫印迹分析。对树突棘密度、形态以及GluA1和GluA2进行免疫组织化学评估。在习得阶段,VH中GluA1-RCC和亚基水平升高。在巩固阶段,DH和VH中GluA1-和GluA2-RCC水平均升高,而仅VH中两种受体亚基水平升高。在提取阶段,DH和VH中GluA1-RCC、其亚基以及GluA2-RCC均升高,而仅VH中GluA2亚基升高。GluN1-RCC水平在习得和巩固阶段升高,而习得阶段亚基水平仅在DH中升高。海马体各区域在各个阶段的免疫组织化学研究支持了GluA1和GluA2 RCC的免疫化学变化。VH习得阶段的树突棘密度以及VH和DH提取阶段的细棘和蘑菇状棘的比例增加。当前研究结果表明,CFC各个阶段以及DH和VH中存在不同的受体和受体复合物模式。结果表明,在各个阶段形成了不同的RCC,且VH和DH可能参与了CFC过程。