Suppr超能文献

从1.0%多佐胺/0.5%马来酸噻吗洛尔滴眼液转换为1.0%布林佐胺/0.5%马来酸噻吗洛尔滴眼液的安全性和有效性。

Safety and efficacy of switching from dorzolamide 1.0%/timolol maleate 0.5% eye drops to brinzolamide 1.0%/timolol maleate 0.5% eye drops.

作者信息

Inoue Kenji, Shiokawa Minako, Ishida Kyoko, Tomita Goji

机构信息

Inouye Eye Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

Department of Ophthalmology, Toho University Ohashi Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Clin Ophthalmol. 2015 Apr 9;9:619-23. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S79843. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of switching from dorzolamide 1.0%/timolol maleate 0.5% fixed-combination (DTFC) eye drops to brinzolamide 1.0%/timolol maleate 0.5% fixed-combination (BTFC) eye drops in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.

METHODS

A total of 35 eyes of 35 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension using DTFC eye drops were included. Participants discontinued DTFC drops and immediately began using BTFC drops. All other eye drops currently being used were continued. Intraocular pressure (IOP) 1 and 3 months after switching medications was compared with baseline IOP. One month after switching medications, participant preference and adherence were evaluated. Adverse reactions were monitored at each study visit.

RESULTS

The IOP was 17.9±2.6 mmHg at baseline and 18.3±4.1 mmHg and 17.8±3.4 mmHg 1 month and 3 months after switching medications, respectively (P=0.633). The frequency of missing a dose was not different before (6.1%) and after (6.1%) switching to BTFC. Significantly fewer participants reported stinging after switching to BTFC (15.2%) than while using DTFC (51.5%, P,0.01). Blurred vision was reported with the same frequency before (39.4%) and after (42.4%) switching to BTFC. A total of 33.3% and 27.3% of patients preferred DTFC and BTFC, respectively. Several patients withdrew from the study because of discomfort (n=2, 5.7%), discharge (n=1, 2.9%), dizziness (n=1, 2.9%), or increased IOP (n=2, 5.7%).

CONCLUSION

Switching from DTFC to BTFC was well tolerated and did not result in IOP changes or a decreased patient adherence. When glaucoma patients complain of stinging with DTFC administration, switching to BTFC is an acceptable treatment option.

摘要

目的

评估原发性开角型青光眼或高眼压症患者从1.0%多佐胺/0.5%马来酸噻吗洛尔固定复方滴眼液(DTFC)转换为1.0%布林佐胺/0.5%马来酸噻吗洛尔固定复方滴眼液(BTFC)的安全性和有效性。

方法

纳入35例使用DTFC滴眼液的原发性开角型青光眼或高眼压症患者的35只眼。参与者停用DTFC滴眼液并立即开始使用BTFC滴眼液。继续使用目前正在使用的所有其他滴眼液。比较换药后1个月和3个月时的眼压(IOP)与基线眼压。换药1个月后,评估参与者的偏好和依从性。在每次研究访视时监测不良反应。

结果

基线时眼压为17.9±2.6 mmHg,换药后1个月和3个月时分别为18.3±4.1 mmHg和17.8±3.4 mmHg(P = 0.633)。转换为BTFC之前(6.1%)和之后(6.1%)漏服剂量的频率没有差异。转换为BTFC后报告刺痛的参与者明显少于使用DTFC时(15.2%对51.5%,P<0.01)。转换为BTFC之前(39.4%)和之后(42.4%)报告视力模糊的频率相同。分别有33.3%和27.3%的患者更喜欢DTFC和BTFC。几名患者因不适(n = 2,5.7%)、分泌物增多(n = 1,2.9%)、头晕(n = 1,2.9%)或眼压升高(n = 2,5.7%)退出研究。

结论

从DTFC转换为BTFC耐受性良好,不会导致眼压变化或患者依从性降低。当青光眼患者抱怨使用DTFC时有刺痛感时,转换为BTFC是一种可接受的治疗选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a96/4401356/c31e31ccf68d/opth-9-619Fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验