Lodeiro-Fernández Leire, Lorenzo-López Laura, Maseda Ana, Núñez-Naveira Laura, Rodríguez-Villamil José Luis, Millán-Calenti José Carlos
Gerontology Research Group, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of A Coruña, Campus of A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain.
Clin Interv Aging. 2015 Apr 9;10:695-702. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S81260. eCollection 2015.
The possible relationship between audiometric hearing thresholds and cognitive performance on language tests was analyzed in a cross-sectional cohort of older adults aged ≥65 years (N=98) with different degrees of cognitive impairment.
Participants were distributed into two groups according to Reisberg's Global Deterioration Scale (GDS): a normal/predementia group (GDS scores 1-3) and a moderate/moderately severe dementia group (GDS scores 4 and 5). Hearing loss (pure-tone audiometry) and receptive and production-based language function (Verbal Fluency Test, Boston Naming Test, and Token Test) were assessed.
Results showed that the dementia group achieved significantly lower scores than the predementia group in all language tests. A moderate negative correlation between hearing loss and verbal comprehension (r=-0.298; P<0.003) was observed in the predementia group (r=-0.363; P<0.007). However, no significant relationship between hearing loss and verbal fluency and naming scores was observed, regardless of cognitive impairment.
In the predementia group, reduced hearing level partially explains comprehension performance but not language production. In the dementia group, hearing loss cannot be considered as an explanatory factor of poor receptive and production-based language performance. These results are suggestive of cognitive rather than simply auditory problems to explain the language impairment in the elderly.
在一个年龄≥65岁、认知障碍程度不同的老年人横断面队列(N = 98)中,分析听力测试阈值与语言测试认知表现之间的可能关系。
根据雷斯伯格总体衰退量表(GDS)将参与者分为两组:正常/轻度认知功能障碍前期组(GDS评分1 - 3)和中度/中度重度痴呆组(GDS评分4和5)。评估听力损失(纯音听力测定)以及基于接受和表达的语言功能(语言流畅性测试、波士顿命名测试和代币测试)。
结果显示,在所有语言测试中,痴呆组的得分显著低于轻度认知功能障碍前期组。在轻度认知功能障碍前期组中,观察到听力损失与言语理解之间存在中度负相关(r = -0.298;P < 0.003)(r = -0.363;P < 0.007)。然而,无论认知障碍情况如何,未观察到听力损失与言语流畅性及命名得分之间存在显著关系。
在轻度认知功能障碍前期组中,听力水平降低部分解释了理解能力,但不能解释语言表达能力。在痴呆组中,听力损失不能被视为基于接受和表达的语言表现不佳的解释因素。这些结果提示,解释老年人语言障碍的是认知问题而非单纯的听觉问题。