An innovative model of evidence-based practice for other professions.
作者信息
Eldredge Jonathan D, Ascher Marie T, Holmes Heather N
出版信息
J Med Libr Assoc. 2015 Apr;103(2):100-2. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.103.2.009.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
An innovative model of evidence-based practice for other professions.一种适用于其他专业的循证实践创新模式。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2015 Apr;103(2):100-2. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.103.2.009.
2
Navigating evidence-based information sources in augmentative and alternative communication.在辅助和替代沟通中浏览循证信息资源。
Augment Altern Commun. 2009 Dec;25(4):225-35. doi: 10.3109/07434610903360649.
3
Integrating research into practice.将研究融入实践。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2016 Oct;104(4):333-337. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.104.4.017.
4
Rarity and review: evidence-based practice for uncommon diseases.罕见病与综述：罕见病的循证医学实践
Can J Anaesth. 2013 May;60(5):419-22. doi: 10.1007/s12630-013-9908-8. Epub 2013 Mar 23.
5
Implementation of Web 2.0 services in academic, medical and research libraries: a scoping review.学术、医学和研究图书馆中 Web 2.0 服务的实现：范围综述。
Health Info Libr J. 2012 Jun;29(2):90-109. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2012.00984.x. Epub 2012 Mar 29.
6
Not at issue.没有争议。
Schizophr Bull. 2012 Mar;38(2):225-6. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbr187. Epub 2012 Jan 18.
7
EditorialEvidence based library and information practice.循证图书馆和信息实践述评。
Health Info Libr J. 2011 Jun;28(2):91-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2011.00939.x.
8
When best evidence is rarer than the disease.
Can J Anaesth. 2013 Nov;60(11):1156-7. doi: 10.1007/s12630-013-0016-6. Epub 2013 Oct 8.
9
Evidence-based information-seeking behaviors of occupational therapists: a survey of recent graduates.职业治疗师基于证据的信息寻求行为：对近期毕业生的一项调查
J Med Libr Assoc. 2011 Oct;99(4):307-10. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.99.4.009.
10
Toward an evidence-based implementation model and checklist for personalized dementia care in the community.迈向社区个性化痴呆症护理的循证实施模型和清单。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2016 May;28(5):801-13. doi: 10.1017/S1041610215001817. Epub 2015 Dec 3.
引用本文的文献
1
Learning while doing: program evaluation of the Medical Library Association Systematic Review Project.在做中学：医学图书馆协会系统评价项目的方案评估。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2018 Jul;106(3):284-293. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2018.286. Epub 2018 Jul 1.
2
Roles for librarians in systematic reviews: a scoping review.图书馆员在系统评价中的作用：一项范围综述
J Med Libr Assoc. 2018 Jan;106(1):46-56. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2018.82. Epub 2018 Jan 2.
3
Integrating research into practice.将研究融入实践。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2016 Oct;104(4):333-337. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.104.4.017.
本文引用的文献
1
Welcoming systematic reviews to the Journal of the Medical Library Association.欢迎向《医学图书馆协会杂志》投稿系统评价。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2014 Jul;102(3):143-5. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.102.3.001.
2
Effects of librarian-provided services in healthcare settings: a systematic review.图书馆员在医疗环境中提供的服务的效果：一项系统综述。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Nov-Dec;21(6):1118-24. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002825. Epub 2014 May 28.
3
JBI's Systematic Reviews: Study selection and critical appraisal.JBI 的系统评价：研究选择与批判性评价。
Am J Nurs. 2014 Jun;114(6):47-52. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000450430.97383.64.
4
The new Medical Library Association research agenda: final results from a three-phase Delphi study.新的医学图书馆协会研究议程：一项三阶段德尔菲研究的最终结果
J Med Libr Assoc. 2012 Jul;100(3):214-8. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.100.3.012.
5
Defining the Medical Library Association research agenda: methodology and final results from a consensus process.界定医学图书馆协会研究议程：共识达成过程的方法与最终结果
J Med Libr Assoc. 2009 Jul;97(3):178-85. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.97.3.006.
6
Understanding evidence-based public health policy.理解循证公共卫生政策。
Am J Public Health. 2009 Sep;99(9):1576-83. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.156224. Epub 2009 Jul 16.
7
Affirming our commitment to research: the Medical Library Association's research policy statement: the process and findings.重申我们对研究的承诺：医学图书馆协会的研究政策声明：过程与成果
J Med Libr Assoc. 2008 Apr;96(2):114-20. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.96.2.114.
8
Evidence-based practice in psychology.心理学中的循证实践。
Am Psychol. 2006 May-Jun;61(4):271-85. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.61.4.271.
9
Delphi survey of nursing research priorities.护理研究重点的德尔菲调查
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2004 Sep 17;31(5):1011-8. doi: 10.1188/04.ONF.1011-1018. Print 2004 Sep.
10
Setting priorities for gerontological social work research: a national Delphi study.确定老年社会工作研究的优先事项：一项全国性德尔菲研究。
Gerontologist. 2003 Dec;43(6):828-38. doi: 10.1093/geront/43.6.828.
Zotero 插件