• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

安氏II类错颌治疗中的头影测量变化。

Cephalometric changes in Angle Class II treatment.

作者信息

Fischer-Brandies H

出版信息

Int J Orthod. 1989 Fall-Winter;27(3-4):9-13.

PMID:2592152
Abstract

The efficiency of Angle class II correction using functional orthopedic appliances is well accepted in the literature. However, there are controversial views as to whether dentoalveolar processes, growth alteration or jaw displacement predominates. This study was therefore designed to clarify the mode of action in class II treatment using Bimler's "GebiBformer". Cephalometric radiographs taken in 146 patients before and after treatment were analysed (mean age at beginning of treatment: 9.2 years). In these patients, Angle class II of one premolar width was successfully corrected during a mean 4.2 years of treatment. Matching data of 100 patients, who had undergone functional jaw orthopaedics because of class I malocclusion served as comparison group. According to cranio-facial growth type, the patients were subdivided in to three subgroups. Statistical analyses were performed using the t-test. The results indicate, that point A develops posteriorly relative to the nasion in the class II group and anteriorly in the class I group. The length of the maxilla develops equally in the groups compared. The sagittal discrepancy between upper and lower jaw deminishes significantly in treated class II patients. The B point comes only slightly more anteriorly in the class II group than in the control group. Shape and length of the mandible showes similar development in the two groups. In correcting class II with the "GebiBformer", changes in the craniofacial pattern take place. However, class II correction cannot be attributable to skeletal changes alone. It can only be explained by additional dentoalveolar changes.

摘要

在文献中,使用功能性矫治器矫治安氏II类错牙合的效率已得到广泛认可。然而,对于牙牙槽突、生长改变或颌骨移位哪个起主要作用,存在争议性观点。因此,本研究旨在阐明使用比姆勒“GebiBformer”矫治器治疗安氏II类错牙合的作用方式。分析了146例患者治疗前后拍摄的头影测量X线片(治疗开始时的平均年龄:9.2岁)。在这些患者中,平均4.2年的治疗期内成功矫治了一个前磨牙宽度的安氏II类错牙合。选取100例因安氏I类错牙合接受功能性颌骨矫形治疗的患者的匹配数据作为对照组。根据颅面部生长类型,将患者分为三个亚组。使用t检验进行统计分析。结果表明,在安氏II类组中,A点相对于鼻根点向后移动,而在安氏I类组中向前移动。相比之下,两组上颌骨长度的发育相同。经治疗的安氏II类患者上下颌矢状向差异明显减小。安氏II类组的B点仅比对照组稍向前移。两组下颌骨的形态和长度发育相似。使用“GebiBformer”矫治器矫治安氏II类错牙合时,颅面形态会发生改变。然而,安氏II类错牙合的矫治不能仅归因于骨骼变化。只能通过额外的牙牙槽突变化来解释。

相似文献

1
Cephalometric changes in Angle Class II treatment.安氏II类错颌治疗中的头影测量变化。
Int J Orthod. 1989 Fall-Winter;27(3-4):9-13.
2
[Cephalometric and tomographic evaluation of the treatment results of Class II division 1 obtained by elastic activator].
Bilt Udruz Ortodonata Jugosl. 1989;22(1):27-30.
3
Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.激活器与高位牵引头帽联合治疗的效果:骨骼、牙牙槽及软组织侧貌变化
Eur J Orthod. 2007 Apr;29(2):140-8. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjm003.
4
Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and cervical headgear appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.Jasper Jumper矫治器和颈带矫治器引起的牙颌面变化,随后进行固定正畸治疗。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Jul;132(1):54-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.07.028.
5
Long-term comparison of treatment outcome and stability of Class II patients treated with functional appliances versus bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy.功能性矫治器与双侧下颌升支矢状劈开截骨术治疗安氏II类患者的治疗效果及稳定性的长期比较
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Apr;127(4):451-64; quiz 516-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.03.028.
6
Treatment timing for Twin-block therapy.双阻板矫治器治疗的时机
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000 Aug;118(2):159-70. doi: 10.1067/mod.2000.105571.
7
Long-term effects of Class III treatment with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy followed by fixed appliances.采用快速上颌扩弓和面罩治疗后使用固定矫治器进行III类错颌治疗的长期效果。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003 Mar;123(3):306-20. doi: 10.1067/mod.2003.44.
8
The influence of functional orthodontics and mandibular sagittal split advancement osteotomy on dental and skeletal variables--a comparative cephalometric study.功能性正畸与下颌矢状劈开前徙截骨术对牙及骨骼变量的影响——一项头影测量对比研究。
Eur J Orthod. 2006 Dec;28(6):553-60. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjl022.
9
Timing of Class II treatment: skeletal changes comparing 1-phase and 2-phase treatment.II类错(牙合)治疗的时机:比较一期治疗和二期治疗的骨骼变化
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Oct;132(4):481-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.08.046.
10
[Evaluation of results in Class II, division 1 malocclusions treated by bionator].[功能性矫治器治疗安氏II类1分类错牙合畸形的疗效评价]
Turk Ortodonti Derg. 1989 Nov;2(2):226-37.

引用本文的文献

1
[A critical evaluation of Class-II anomalies treated with functional orthodontic appliances].[对使用功能性正畸矫治器治疗的II类错畸形的批判性评价]
Fortschr Kieferorthop. 1993 Dec;54(6):237-48. doi: 10.1007/BF02179833.