Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Yamadaoka 2-2, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Department of Frontier-Science for Cancer and Chemotherapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Yamadaoka 2-2, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Eur J Cancer. 2015 Jul;51(10):1274-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.03.024. Epub 2015 Apr 24.
The oral neurokinin-1 antagonist aprepitant is recommended in several guidelines for preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea & vomiting (CINV) due to highly emetogenic cancer chemotherapy. Little is known about the feasibility and safety of aprepitant in patients treated with oxaliplatin.
In this multicentre, open label, randomised, phase 3 trial, we recruited patients with colorectal cancer who underwent an oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. Patients were centrally randomised in a 1:1 ratio to the control group (5-HT3-receptor antagonist+dexamethasone) or aprepitant group (5-HT3-receptor antagonist+dexamethasone+aprepitant or fosaprepitant) in the first course. All patients were treated with aprepitant/fosaprepitant therapy in the second course. The primary end-point was the proportion of patients with no emesis.
A total of 413 patients entered this clinical trial from 25 centres in Japan. Significantly more patients in the aprepitant group achieved no vomiting overall and delayed phase than those in the control group (95.7% versus 83.6%, and 95.7% versus 84.7%, respectively). The aprepitant group also had statistically significantly higher percentages of no significant nausea, complete response and complete protection than the control group overall. In the control group, the percentages of no vomiting were higher in the second cycle than in the first cycle. The incidence of vomiting occurred day 7 or later was significantly higher in the control group compared with the aprepitant group. Other adverse events were not significant between the groups.
The aprepitant therapy was more effective than the control therapy for prevention of CINV in colorectal cancer patients receiving an oxaliplatin-based regimen.
由于高致吐性癌症化疗,几种指南均推荐使用口服神经激肽-1 拮抗剂阿瑞匹坦来预防化疗引起的恶心和呕吐(CINV)。然而,对于接受奥沙利铂治疗的患者,阿瑞匹坦的可行性和安全性知之甚少。
在这项多中心、开放标签、随机、3 期临床试验中,我们招募了接受奥沙利铂为基础化疗的结直肠癌患者。患者以 1:1 的比例在中央随机分为对照组(5-HT3 受体拮抗剂+地塞米松)或阿瑞匹坦组(5-HT3 受体拮抗剂+地塞米松+阿瑞匹坦或福沙匹坦),在第一疗程中接受治疗。所有患者在第二疗程中接受阿瑞匹坦/福沙匹坦治疗。主要终点是无呕吐的患者比例。
共有 413 名患者来自日本 25 个中心参加了这项临床试验。阿瑞匹坦组的患者在总体和延迟期无呕吐和无明显恶心的比例明显高于对照组(95.7%比 83.6%,95.7%比 84.7%)。阿瑞匹坦组的完全缓解和完全保护的比例也明显高于对照组。在对照组中,第二周期的无呕吐率高于第一周期。与阿瑞匹坦组相比,对照组第 7 天或以后发生呕吐的发生率显著更高。两组之间的其他不良事件无显著差异。
与对照组相比,奥沙利铂治疗方案中加入阿瑞匹坦治疗对于预防接受奥沙利铂方案的结直肠癌患者的 CINV 更有效。