Morriss Lisa
Institute of Brain, Behaviour and Mental Health, Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, University of Manchester, UK.
Sociol Health Illn. 2015 Sep;37(7):1072-85. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.12285. Epub 2015 Apr 29.
The article explores the telling of co-narrated atrocity stories in accomplishing professional identity. Building on previous work, it is argued that group membership is a prerequisite for such stories to be told. Extracts from empirical data from interviews with social work approved mental health professionals are analysed using an ethnomethodological approach. The findings show how atrocity stories can be co-narrated, not only by longstanding colleagues, but also by two unacquainted persons who share the same professional identity. The article concludes that the ethnomethodological concepts of vulgar competency, unique adequacy, indexicality and the documentary method of interpretation are key to understanding the accomplishment of co-narrated atrocity stories.
本文探讨了在构建职业身份过程中共同讲述暴行故事的情况。基于先前的研究，文章认为群体成员身份是讲述此类故事的先决条件。采用民族方法论方法，对与社会工作认可的心理健康专业人员访谈的实证数据摘录进行了分析。研究结果表明，暴行故事不仅可以由长期同事共同讲述，也可以由具有相同职业身份的两个陌生人共同讲述。文章得出结论，通俗能力、独特充分性、索引性和解释性文献方法等民族方法论概念是理解共同讲述暴行故事的关键。
