• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[AO弹性髓内钉治疗锁骨骨折]

[AO elastic intramedullary nailing for the treatment of clavicle fractures].

作者信息

Xu Hong-wei, Hu Jun-yu, Jia Shao-hua, Zhang Zhong-wei, Gong Sui-liang

出版信息

Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2015 Feb;28(2):106-11.

PMID:25924489
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the outcome of Titanium elastic intramedullary nailing (TEN) for the treatment of displaced midclavicular fractures.

METHODS

Between February 2010 and February 2013, 62 patients with displaced midclavicular fractures were treated by TEN, including 27 males and 35 females with an average age of 37.6 years old ranging from 15 to 67 years. The course of disease was from 1 to 9 days (means 2.7 days). Thirty-nine cases were treated by closed reduction and 23 cases by assistant small incision. Based on OTA (the Orthopaedic Trauma Association classification) classification, 31 cases of simple fractures involved 5 cases of 06-A1,15 cases of 06-A2,11 cases of 06-A3; 31 cases of wedge fractures involved 4 cases of 06-B1,12 cases of 06-B2,15 cases of 06-B3. Postoperative pain relief were evaluated by VAS score,and operation time,fracture healing time were recorded. After 6 weeks and after removing internal fixation shoulder joint function was evaluated by Constant score, and shoulder joint function were assessed by Herscovici score after 6 weeks.

RESULTS

Except 2 cases were lost to follow-up, 2 cases did not remove internal fixation, 3 cases' fractures were nonunion, the remaining 55 patients received follow-up for an average time of 11.4 months. The average preoperative VAS score was 5.20±0.71, and it turned to be 1.550.59 at 3 days after operation. The average operative duration was 40 min (15 to 65 min). The average bone healing time was (2.71±0.54) months (2 to 5 months). No difference about bone healing time was found between simple fractures and wedge fractures,and between the patients treated by closed reduction and assistant small incision. According to Herscovici standard, the shoulder function was excellent in 49 cases, good in 4, fair in 1, and poor in 1. Simple fractures achieved better Constant score than wedge fractures at 6 weeks postoperatively, whereas no difference was found at 4 weeks after fixation removal.

CONCLUSION

Titanium elastic nails (TEN) for treatment of displaced midclavicular fractures has advantages of good clinical effect,rapid pain relief,fast recovery of shoulder joint function. For OTA classification type B patients with comminuted fracture can replace steel to achieve very good effect, but to grasp the appropriate.

摘要

目的

评估钛弹性髓内钉(TEN)治疗移位性锁骨中段骨折的疗效。

方法

2010年2月至2013年2月,62例移位性锁骨中段骨折患者接受TEN治疗,其中男性27例,女性35例,平均年龄37.6岁(15至67岁)。病程1至9天(平均2.7天)。39例采用闭合复位,23例采用辅助小切口。根据OTA(骨科创伤协会分类)分类,31例简单骨折中,06-A1型5例,06-A2型15例,06-A3型11例;31例楔形骨折中,06-B1型4例,06-B2型12例,06-B3型15例。术后采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评估疼痛缓解情况,记录手术时间、骨折愈合时间。术后6周及取出内固定后,采用Constant评分评估肩关节功能,术后6周采用Herscovici评分评估肩关节功能。

结果

除2例失访、2例未取出内固定、3例骨折不愈合外,其余55例患者平均随访11.4个月。术前VAS平均评分为5.20±0.71,术后3天降至1.55±0.59。平均手术时间为40分钟(15至65分钟)。平均骨折愈合时间为(2.71±0.54)个月(2至5个月)。简单骨折与楔形骨折之间、闭合复位与辅助小切口治疗患者之间的骨折愈合时间无差异。根据Herscovici标准,肩关节功能优49例,良4例,可1例,差1例。术后6周简单骨折的Constant评分优于楔形骨折,而取出内固定后4周无差异。

结论

钛弹性髓内钉(TEN)治疗移位性锁骨中段骨折具有临床效果好、疼痛缓解快、肩关节功能恢复快等优点。对于OTA分类B型粉碎性骨折患者可替代钢板取得很好的效果,但要把握合适时机。

相似文献

1
[AO elastic intramedullary nailing for the treatment of clavicle fractures].[AO弹性髓内钉治疗锁骨骨折]
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2015 Feb;28(2):106-11.
2
[Intramedullary stabilisation of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures: does the fracture pattern (simple vs. complex) influence the anatomic and functional result].[移位型锁骨中段骨折的髓内固定:骨折类型(简单型与复杂型)是否会影响解剖学和功能结果]
Z Orthop Unfall. 2014 Dec;152(6):588-95. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1383206. Epub 2014 Dec 22.
3
[Clinical observation of the second operation for refracture after internal fixation of clavicle].[锁骨内固定术后再骨折二次手术的临床观察]
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2017 Oct 25;30(10):940-945. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2017.10.012.
4
[Use of titanium elastic intramedullary nails in the treatment of adult midshaft clavicular fractures: technical skills, precautions and complications].钛弹性髓内钉治疗成人锁骨中段骨折:技术技巧、注意事项及并发症
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2012 Apr;25(4):274-7.
5
[Minimal invasive elastic intramedullary nails and external fixation for treatment of comminuted closed fracture of tibia-fibula shaft].微创弹性髓内钉与外固定治疗胫腓骨干粉碎性闭合骨折
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2015 May;28(5):412-6.
6
Elastic stable intramedullary nailing of midclavicular fractures in adults: 32 patients followed for 1-5 years.成人锁骨中段骨折的弹性稳定髓内钉固定术:32例患者随访1至5年。
Acta Orthop. 2007 Jun;78(3):421-3. doi: 10.1080/17453670710014013.
7
Elastic stable intramedullary nailing versus nonoperative treatment of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures-a randomized, controlled, clinical trial.弹性稳定髓内钉固定与非手术治疗移位型锁骨中段骨折的随机对照临床试验
J Orthop Trauma. 2009 Feb;23(2):106-12. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318190cf88.
8
[Minimally invasive retrograde insertion of elastic intramedullary nails for displaced clavicle fractures in children].[弹性髓内钉微创逆行插入治疗儿童移位性锁骨骨折]
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2018 Sep 25;31(9):808-811. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2018.09.006.
9
Elastic stable intramedullary nailing of midclavicular fractures in athletes.运动员锁骨中段骨折的弹性稳定髓内钉固定术
Br J Sports Med. 2003 Dec;37(6):480-3; discussion 484. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.37.6.480.
10
[Treatment of fresh tossy type III acromioclavicular joint dislocations and neer type II distal clavicle fractures with clavicular hook plate].锁骨钩钢板治疗新鲜TossyⅢ型肩锁关节脱位及NeerⅡ型锁骨远端骨折
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2010 Jan;24(1):69-73.

引用本文的文献

1
The treatment of the atrophic clavicular nonunion by double-plate fixation with autogenous cancellous bone graft: a prospective study.双钢板内固定加自体松质骨植骨治疗萎缩性锁骨骨不连:前瞻性研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Jan 7;16(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-02154-y.