• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

微创稳定系统(LISS)与髁支持钢板治疗成人AO C型股骨远端骨折的对比研究

[Comparative study of less invasive stabilization system (LISS) and the condylar support plates for the treatment of AO type C distal femoral fractures in adults].

作者信息

Chen Yu-tao, Yang Jiang-wei, Hou Hai-bin, Wang Chun-sheng, Wang Kun-zheng

出版信息

Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2015 Feb;28(2):136-40.

PMID:25924495
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the complications and the early clinical effect of less invasive stabilization system and the femoral condylar support plates in the treatment of AO type C distal femoral fractures.

METHODS

From September 2007 to February 2012, 46 patients with AO type C distal femoral fractures were retrospectively studied. Of all patients 25 were treated with less invasive stabilization system including 14 males and 11 females with a mean age of (56.3±4.2) years old; according to AO classification, there were 14 cases of C1, 8 cases of C2 and 3 cases of C3 with a mean hospital stay of (15.6±1.7) days. While 21 cases were treated with femoral condylar support plates fixation including 12 males and 9 females with a mean age of (53.8±5.1) years old;there were 13 cases of C1, 6 cases of C2 and 2 cases of C3 with a mean hospital stay of (17.8±2.2) days. Comparative analysis was performed from the operation related index,postoperative complications and Evanich score of the knee joint function between the two groups at follow-up.

RESULTS

All 46 patients were followed up from 13 to 38 months with a mean time of 19.6 months after surgery. Complications included 1 case with infection,3 cases with internal fixation failure, 1 case with nonunion and 1 case with activity limitation of the affected knee. The differences in the incision length, blood loss, fracture healing time were significant between two groups (P<0.05), while there was no significant difference in the duration of operations, hospital stays and the incidence of postoperative complications between two groups (P>0.05). The statistical significance was also found in the Evanich score at last follow-up between two groups (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Patients with less invasive stabilization system fixation had the characteristics of less trauma, shorter fracture healing time and better functional recovery. Less invasive stabilization system had became one of the ideal internal fixations in the treatment of AO type C distal femoral fractures.

摘要

目的

总结微创稳定系统和股骨髁支持钢板治疗AO C型股骨远端骨折的并发症及早期临床疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2007年9月至2012年2月收治的46例AO C型股骨远端骨折患者。其中25例采用微创稳定系统治疗,男14例,女11例,平均年龄(56.3±4.2)岁;按AO分型,C1型14例,C2型8例,C3型3例,平均住院时间(15.6±1.7)天。21例采用股骨髁支持钢板固定,男12例,女9例,平均年龄(53.8±5.1)岁;C1型13例,C2型6例,C3型2例,平均住院时间(17.8±2.2)天。对两组患者的手术相关指标、术后并发症及随访时膝关节功能Evanich评分进行对比分析。

结果

46例患者均获随访,随访时间13~38个月,平均术后19.6个月。并发症包括感染1例、内固定失败3例、骨不连1例、患膝关节活动受限1例。两组切口长度、出血量、骨折愈合时间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),而手术时间、住院时间及术后并发症发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组末次随访时Evanich评分差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

微创稳定系统固定治疗患者创伤小、骨折愈合时间短、功能恢复好。微创稳定系统已成为治疗AO C型股骨远端骨折的理想内固定方式之一。

相似文献

1
[Comparative study of less invasive stabilization system (LISS) and the condylar support plates for the treatment of AO type C distal femoral fractures in adults].微创稳定系统(LISS)与髁支持钢板治疗成人AO C型股骨远端骨折的对比研究
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2015 Feb;28(2):136-40.
2
[Osteosynthesis for periprosthetic supracondylar fracture above a total knee arthroplasty using a locking compression plate].使用锁定加压钢板治疗全膝关节置换术后假体周围髁上骨折的接骨术
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2009 Dec;76(6):473-8.
3
Are Locking Constructs in Distal Femoral Fractures Always Best? A Prospective Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Less Invasive Stabilization System With the Minimally Invasive Dynamic Condylar Screw System.股骨远端骨折中的锁定结构总是最佳选择吗?一项比较微创稳定系统与微创动力髁螺钉系统的前瞻性多中心随机对照试验。
J Orthop Trauma. 2016 Jan;30(1):e1-6. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000450.
4
[Interlocking intramedullary nailling and micro-invasive internal fixation with plate for multiple segmental tibiofibular fractures: a case-control study].[交锁髓内钉与微创钢板内固定治疗多节段胫腓骨骨折的病例对照研究]
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2015 Apr;28(4):363-7.
5
The role of LISS (less invasive stabilisation system) in the treatment of peri-knee fractures.LISS(微创稳定系统)在膝关节周围骨折治疗中的作用。
Injury. 2009 Nov;40(11):1187-94. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2009.03.012. Epub 2009 Jun 16.
6
[Internal fixation with the supporting steel of AO femoral condyles for treatment of complicated distal femoral fractures].AO股骨髁支撑钢板内固定治疗复杂股骨远端骨折
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2006 Jul;20(7):706-8.
7
[Titanium elastic nail versus plate-screw fixation for the treatment of upper segment fractures of femoral shaft in children].钛弹性髓内钉与钢板螺钉固定治疗儿童股骨干上段骨折的对比研究
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2014 Oct;27(10):809-14.
8
Fixation of distal femoral fractures with the Less Invasive Stabilization System: a minimally invasive treatment with locked fixed-angle screws.使用微创稳定系统固定股骨远端骨折:一种采用锁定固定角度螺钉的微创治疗方法。
J Trauma. 2008 Dec;65(6):1425-34. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318166d24a.
9
Early results of the less invasive stabilization system for mechanically unstable fractures of the distal femur (AO/OTA types A2, A3, C2, and C3).用于股骨远端机械性不稳定骨折(AO/OTA A2、A3、C2和C3型)的微创稳定系统的早期结果
J Orthop Trauma. 2004 Sep;18(8):503-8. doi: 10.1097/00005131-200409000-00005.
10
Comparison of the 95-degree angled blade plate and the locking condylar plate for the treatment of distal femoral fractures.95 度角 blade 钢板与锁定髁钢板治疗股骨远端骨折的比较。
J Orthop Trauma. 2012 Jun;26(6):327-32. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318234d460.

引用本文的文献

1
Double plating of intra-articular multifragmentary C3-type distal femoral fractures through the anterior approach.经前路对关节内多碎片型C3型股骨远端骨折进行双钢板固定。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2018 Jan;28(1):121-130. doi: 10.1007/s00590-017-2014-9. Epub 2017 Jul 14.