Chou Wen-Chi, Kao Chen-Yi, Wang Po-Nan, Chang Hung, Wang Hung-Ming, Chang Pei-Hung, Yeh Kun-Yun, Hung Yu-Shin
Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Linkou branch, and School of Medicine, Chang Gung University, No. 5 Fuxing Street, Guishan Township, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Keelung branch, Keelung, Taiwan.
BMC Palliat Care. 2015 Apr 30;14:18. doi: 10.1186/s12904-015-0011-5.
The clinical course for hematologic malignancy varies widely and no prognostic tool is available for patients with a hematologic malignancy under palliative care. To assess the application of the Palliative Prognostic Index (PPI), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS) as prognostic tools in patients with hematologic malignancies under palliative care.
We included 217 patients with pathologically proven hematologic malignancies under palliative care consultation service (PCCS) between January 2006 and December 2012 at a single medical center in Taiwan. Patients were categorized into subgroups by PPI, CCI, and GPS for survival analysis.
The median survival was 16 days (interquartile range, 4-47.5 days) for all patients and 204 patients (94%) died within 180 days after PCCS. There was a significant difference in survival among patients categorized using the PPI (median survival 49, 15, and 7 days in patients categorized into a good, intermittent, and poor prognostic group, respectively) and the GPS (median survival 66 and 13 days for GPS 0 and 1, respectively). There was no difference in survival between patients with a GPS score of 0 versus 2, or a CCI score of 0 versus ≥1. The survival time was significantly discriminated after stratifying patients with a good PPI score based on the CCI (median survival 102 and 41 days in patients with a CCI score of 0 and ≥1, respectively) from those with a poor PPI score by using the GPS (median survival 47 and 7 days in patients with GPS scores of 0 and 1-2, respectively).
PPI is a useful prognosticator of life expectancy in terminally ill patients under palliative care for a hematologic malignancy. Concurrent use of the GPS and CCI improved the accuracy of prognostication using the PPI.
血液系统恶性肿瘤的临床病程差异很大,对于接受姑息治疗的血液系统恶性肿瘤患者,尚无可用的预后评估工具。评估姑息预后指数(PPI)、查尔森合并症指数(CCI)和格拉斯哥预后评分(GPS)作为接受姑息治疗的血液系统恶性肿瘤患者预后评估工具的应用情况。
我们纳入了2006年1月至2012年12月期间在台湾一家医疗中心接受姑息治疗咨询服务(PCCS)且经病理证实为血液系统恶性肿瘤的217例患者。根据PPI、CCI和GPS将患者分为亚组进行生存分析。
所有患者的中位生存期为16天(四分位间距,4 - 47.5天),204例患者(94%)在PCCS后180天内死亡。使用PPI分类的患者(分别归入良好、间断和不良预后组的患者中位生存期为49天、15天和7天)和使用GPS分类的患者(GPS为0和1时中位生存期分别为66天和13天)之间的生存情况存在显著差异。GPS评分为0与2的患者之间或CCI评分为0与≥1的患者之间的生存情况无差异。根据CCI将PPI评分良好的患者分层后(CCI评分为0和≥1的患者中位生存期分别为102天和41天),与根据GPS将PPI评分不良的患者分层后(GPS评分为0和1 - 2的患者中位生存期分别为47天和7天),生存时间有显著差异。
PPI是接受血液系统恶性肿瘤姑息治疗的晚期患者预期寿命的有用预后指标。同时使用GPS和CCI可提高使用PPI进行预后评估的准确性。