Choi Jung Yoon, Takahashi Daniel Y, Ghazanfar Asif A
Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey; Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey; and.
Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey; Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey; and Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey
J Neurophysiol. 2015 Jul;114(1):274-83. doi: 10.1152/jn.00228.2015. Epub 2015 Apr 29.
Humans adjust speech amplitude as a function of distance from a listener; we do so in a manner that would compensate for such distance. This ability is presumed to be the product of high-level sociocognitive skills. Nonhuman primates are thought to lack such socially related flexibility in vocal production. Using predictions from a simple arousal-based model whereby vocal feedback from a conspecific modulates the drive to produce a vocalization, we tested whether another primate exhibits this type of cooperative vocal control. We conducted a playback experiment with marmoset monkeys and simulated "far-away" and "nearby" conspecifics using contact calls that differed in sound intensity. We found that marmoset monkeys increased the amplitude of their contact calls and produced such calls with shorter response latencies toward more distant conspecifics. The same was not true in response to changing levels of background noise. To account for how simulated conspecific distance can change both the amplitude and timing of vocal responses, we developed a model that incorporates dynamic interactions between the auditory system and limbic "drive" systems. Overall, our data show that, like humans, marmoset monkeys cooperatively control the acoustics of their vocalizations according to changes in listener distance, increasing the likelihood that a conspecific will hear their call. However, we propose that such cooperative vocal control is a system property that does not necessitate any particularly advanced sociocognitive skill. At least in marmosets, this vocal control can be parsimoniously explained by the regulation of arousal states across two interacting individuals via vocal feedback.
人类会根据与听众的距离来调整语音幅度;我们以一种能够补偿这种距离的方式来进行调整。这种能力被认为是高级社会认知技能的产物。非人类灵长类动物被认为在发声方面缺乏这种与社会相关的灵活性。基于一个简单的基于唤醒的模型的预测,即来自同种个体的声音反馈调节发声的驱动力,我们测试了另一种灵长类动物是否表现出这种类型的合作性声音控制。我们对狨猴进行了回放实验,并使用声音强度不同的接触叫声模拟“远处”和“近处”的同种个体。我们发现,狨猴会提高它们接触叫声的幅度,并以更短的反应潜伏期向更远的同种个体发出这种叫声。而对背景噪音水平的变化,情况并非如此。为了解释模拟的同种个体距离如何能改变声音反应的幅度和时间,我们开发了一个模型,该模型纳入了听觉系统和边缘“驱动”系统之间的动态相互作用。总体而言,我们的数据表明,与人类一样,狨猴会根据听众距离的变化合作控制其发声的声学特征,增加同种个体听到其叫声的可能性。然而,我们提出这种合作性声音控制是一种系统特性,并不需要任何特别先进的社会认知技能。至少在狨猴中,这种声音控制可以通过两个相互作用个体之间通过声音反馈对唤醒状态的调节来简洁地解释。