Suppr超能文献

用纳曲酮进行慢性治疗可预防被沙林类似物二异丙基氟磷酸酯(DFP)中毒并接受阿托品和氯解磷定治疗的大鼠出现记忆保持缺陷。

Chronic Treatment with Naltrexone Prevents Memory Retention Deficits in Rats Poisoned with the Sarin Analog Diisopropylfluorophosphate (DFP) and Treated with Atropine and Pralidoxime.

作者信息

Brewer Kori L, Tran Tuan, Meggs William J

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, 600 Moye Boulevard, Room 3ED311, Greenville, NC, 27834, USA.

Department of Psychology, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA.

出版信息

J Med Toxicol. 2015 Dec;11(4):433-8. doi: 10.1007/s13181-015-0480-1.

Abstract

Humans and rats poisoned with sarin develop chronic neurological disabilities that are not prevented with standardized antidotal therapy. We hypothesized that rats poisoned with the sarin analogue diisopropylfluorophosphate (DFP) and resuscitated with atropine and pralidoxime would have long-term memory deficits that were preventable with naltrexone treatment. Long Evans rats (250-275 g) were randomized to: DFP (N = 8): single subcutaneous (SC) injection of DFP (5 mg/kg). Treatment (N = 9): DFP (5 mg/kg) followed by chronic naltrexone (5 mg/kg/day × 12 weeks). Control (N = 12): single SC injection of isopropyl alcohol, (DFP vehicle) followed by chronic naltrexone (5 mg/kg/day). If toxicity developed after injection, antidotal therapy was initiated with atropine (2 mg/kg) and pralidoxime (25 mg/kg) and repeated as needed. After 12 weeks, rats underwent testing for place learning (acquisition) across 5 days of training using the Morris Water Maze. On day 6 a memory retention test was performed. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics. Rats receiving DFP rapidly developed toxicity requiring antidotal rescue. No differences in acquisition were seen between the DFP vs. DFP + naltrexone rats. During memory testing, DFP-poisoned rats spent significantly less time (29.4 ± 2.11 versus 38.5 ± 2.5 s, p < 0.05) and traveled less distance (267 ± 24.6 versus 370 ± 27.5 cm, p < 0.05) in the target quadrant compared to the treatment group. Treatment rats performed as well as control rats (p > 0.05) on the test for memory retention. Poisoning with DFP induced impaired memory retention. Deficits were not prevented by acute rescue with atropine and pralidoxime. Chronic naltrexone treatment led to preserved memory after DFP poisoning.

摘要

人类和受沙林毒气毒害的大鼠会出现慢性神经功能障碍,标准化的解毒治疗无法预防这种情况。我们假设,用沙林类似物二异丙基氟磷酸酯(DFP)毒害并通过阿托品和氯解磷定进行复苏的大鼠会出现长期记忆缺陷,而纳曲酮治疗可以预防这种缺陷。将体重250 - 275克的长 Evans 大鼠随机分为:DFP组(N = 8):单次皮下注射DFP(5毫克/千克)。治疗组(N = 9):DFP(5毫克/千克),随后进行慢性纳曲酮治疗(5毫克/千克/天×12周)。对照组(N = 12):单次皮下注射异丙醇(DFP的赋形剂),随后进行慢性纳曲酮治疗(5毫克/千克/天)。如果注射后出现毒性反应,则开始用阿托品(2毫克/千克)和氯解磷定(25毫克/千克)进行解毒治疗,并根据需要重复给药。12周后,使用莫里斯水迷宫对大鼠进行为期5天的位置学习(获取)测试。在第6天进行记忆保持测试。使用IBM SPSS Statistics进行统计分析。接受DFP的大鼠迅速出现毒性反应,需要解毒抢救。DFP组与DFP + 纳曲酮组在获取方面没有差异。在记忆测试期间,与治疗组相比,受DFP毒害的大鼠在目标象限花费显著更少的时间(29.4 ± 2.11秒对38.5 ± 2.5秒,p < 0.05),行进的距离也更短(267 ± 24.6厘米对370 ± 27.5厘米,p < 0.05)。治疗组大鼠在记忆保持测试中的表现与对照组大鼠相当(p > 0.05)。DFP中毒导致记忆保持受损。阿托品和氯解磷定的急性抢救未能预防缺陷。慢性纳曲酮治疗可使DFP中毒后记忆得以保留。

相似文献

10
Effects of PAM, proPAM, and DFP on behavior, thermoregulation, and brain AChE in rats.
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1982 Nov;17(5):1001-8. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(82)90485-3.

本文引用的文献

7
Acute toxicity of some nerve agents and pesticides in rats.某些神经毒剂和杀虫剂对大鼠的急性毒性
Drug Chem Toxicol. 2015 Jan;38(1):32-6. doi: 10.3109/01480545.2014.900070. Epub 2014 Mar 18.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验