Larsen Torben Bjerregaard, Potpara Tatjana, Dagres Nikolaos, Proclemer Alessandro, Sciarrafia Elena, Blomström-Lundqvist Carina
Department of Cardiology, Aalborg AF Study Group, Aalborg University Hospital, Søndre Skovvej 15, Aalborg DK-9000, Denmark
Cardiology Clinic, Clinical Centre of Serbia, School of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Europace. 2015 May;17(5):819-24. doi: 10.1093/europace/euv116.
The purpose of this European Heart Rhythm Association Survey was to assess the clinical practice in relation to the use of oral anticoagulation therapy for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) in Europe. Of special interest were patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), cardioversion procedures, catheter ablation, surgery, and those suffering from anticoagulation-related bleeding. Of 38 responding centres, non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) were used for stroke prophylaxis and were preferred (33.3%) or considered equal (48.5%) to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). Only 3% did not use NOACs at all. There were some practice differences regarding the use of NOACs in combination with dual antiplatelet therapy in AF patients undergoing PCI, and only 12% preferred using NOACs in this setting. Bare metal stents were preferred rather than drug-eluting stents in AF patients at high bleeding risk. There were clear practice differences between centres regarding the use of triple therapy. Most of the major bleeding events would be handled using symptomatic and supportive measures (e.g. mechanical compression, fluid replacement, blood transfusion, prothrombin complex concentrate, or recombinant Factor VIIa). More than 80% of the centres offer either VKA or NOAC for at least 3 weeks before and after cardioversion and 70% offer either VKA or NOAC before and after AF catheter ablation. Patients treated with an NOAC were routinely re-assed in most centres.
欧洲心律协会这项调查的目的是评估欧洲针对心房颤动(AF)患者使用口服抗凝治疗的临床实践情况。特别受关注的是接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)、心脏复律、导管消融、手术的患者,以及那些发生抗凝相关出血的患者。在38个做出回应的中心中,非维生素K拮抗剂口服抗凝药(NOACs)用于预防卒中,被认为更优(33.3%)或与维生素K拮抗剂(VKAs)相当(48.5%)。只有3%的中心完全不使用NOACs。在接受PCI的AF患者中,关于联合使用NOACs和双联抗血小板治疗存在一些实践差异,在此情况下只有12%的中心倾向使用NOACs。对于出血风险高的AF患者,裸金属支架比药物洗脱支架更受青睐。各中心在三联疗法的使用上存在明显的实践差异。大多数严重出血事件将采用对症和支持措施处理(如机械压迫、补液、输血、凝血酶原复合物浓缩剂或重组凝血因子VIIa)。超过80%的中心在心脏复律前后至少3周提供VKA或NOAC,70%的中心在AF导管消融前后提供VKA或NOAC。在大多数中心,接受NOAC治疗的患者会定期接受重新评估。