Hope Anna E, Sugarman Laurence I
a Rochester Institute of Technology , Rochester , New York , USA.
Am J Clin Hypn. 2015 Jan;57(3):212-29. doi: 10.1080/00029157.2014.976787.
This article presents a new frame for understanding hypnosis and its clinical applications. Despite great potential to transform health and care, hypnosis research and clinical integration is impaired in part by centuries of misrepresentation and ignorance about its demonstrated efficacy. The authors contend that advances in the field are primarily encumbered by the lack of distinct boundaries and definitions. Here, hypnosis, trance, and mind are all redefined and grounded in biological, neurological, and psychological phenomena. Solutions are proposed for boundary and language problems associated with hypnosis. The biological role of novelty stimulating an orienting response that, in turn, potentiates systemic plasticity forms the basis for trance. Hypnosis is merely the skill set that perpetuates and influences trance. This formulation meshes with many aspects of Milton Erickson's legacy and Ernest Rossi's recent theory of mind and health. Implications of this hypothesis for clinical skills, professional training, and research are discussed.
本文提出了一个理解催眠及其临床应用的新框架。尽管催眠在改变健康和护理方面具有巨大潜力,但几个世纪以来对其已证实疗效的错误描述和忽视,在一定程度上阻碍了催眠研究和临床整合。作者认为,该领域的进展主要受到缺乏明确界限和定义的阻碍。在此,催眠、恍惚状态和心智都在生物学、神经学和心理现象的基础上进行了重新定义。针对与催眠相关的界限和语言问题提出了解决方案。新奇事物刺激定向反应,进而增强全身可塑性的生物学作用构成了恍惚状态的基础。催眠仅仅是使恍惚状态持续并影响其的技能组合。这一表述与米尔顿·埃里克森的遗产以及欧内斯特·罗西最近的心智与健康理论的许多方面相契合。讨论了这一假设对临床技能、专业培训和研究的影响。