A. de Gruchy, BAppSci(Physio), Emergency Department, Royal Melbourne Hospital, 300 Grattan St, Parkville, Victoria 3050, Australia, and Physiotherapy Department, University of Melbourne, Victoria 3050, Australia.
C. Granger, PhD, BPhysio(Hons), Physiotherapy Department, Royal Melbourne Hospital, and Physiotherapy Department, University of Melbourne.
Phys Ther. 2015 Sep;95(9):1207-16. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20130552. Epub 2015 Apr 30.
Increasing pressure on the emergency department (ED) throughout the world has meant the introduction of innovative ways of working. One such innovation is the advanced practice physical therapist (APP) acting as a primary contact practitioner. There has been little research into the role beyond identifying patient satisfaction with management, cost-effectiveness, and time efficiency. In order to give further support and assist in development of an APP service in the ED, an increased exploration of patient caseload demographics, resource utilization, and management outcomes is needed.
The purpose of this study was to provide quantitative data regarding patient demographics, time efficiency, resource utilization, and management outcomes to examine the APP role in the ED.
This was a prospective observational study of practice.
The study was conducted in a single ED in Melbourne, Australia.
Data collection was conducted over a 6-month period. Patient demographics and diagnoses, assessment times, hospital resource utilization, and discharge destinations were recorded.
One thousand seventeen patients (45% female; median age=34 years, interquartile range=25-52) were managed by the APPs; 89% had conditions triaged as not serious or life threatening, and 97% had musculoskeletal pathologies, with the most common diagnosis being fracture or dislocation. Four-hour length-of-stay targets were met in 95% of the patients. Forty-six percent of the patients seen were managed independently, without any support from medical colleagues. The most frequent discharge destination was a referral back to the primary care physician or to hospital outpatient clinics. When comparing similar diagnostic groups, the APPs were significantly more time-efficient than ED physicians in their patient management.
This study described in detail the caseload managed by the APP in the ED and identified the role as a valuable asset to an ED, managing a great deal of their caseload independently, safely, and time efficiently.
世界各地急诊部(ED)的压力不断增加,这意味着需要引入创新的工作方式。其中一项创新是让高级执业物理治疗师(APP)担任主要联系医生。除了确定患者对管理、成本效益和时间效率的满意度外,对该角色的研究甚少。为了进一步支持和协助 ED 中 APP 服务的发展,需要更深入地探讨患者病例的人口统计学特征、资源利用和管理结果。
本研究的目的是提供有关患者人口统计学特征、时间效率、资源利用和管理结果的定量数据,以检验 APP 在 ED 中的作用。
这是一项实践的前瞻性观察研究。
该研究在澳大利亚墨尔本的一家 ED 进行。
数据收集在 6 个月内进行。记录患者的人口统计学特征和诊断、评估时间、医院资源利用和出院去向。
1017 名患者(45%为女性;中位数年龄为 34 岁,四分位距为 25-52 岁)由 APP 管理;89%的患者病情被归类为不严重或无生命威胁,97%的患者患有肌肉骨骼疾病,最常见的诊断是骨折或脱位。95%的患者达到了 4 小时的留观时间目标。46%的就诊患者独立接受治疗,无需任何医疗同事的支持。最常见的出院去向是转回初级保健医生或医院门诊诊所。在比较相似的诊断组时,APP 在患者管理方面比 ED 医生更具时间效率。
本研究详细描述了 APP 在 ED 管理的病例,并确定了该角色是 ED 的宝贵资产,能够独立、安全、高效地管理大量病例。