Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Laboratory for Respiratory Neuroscience and Mucosal Immunity, School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia.
QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia.
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015 Oct;136(4):1065-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2015.02.032. Epub 2015 Apr 28.
A variant in the IL-6 receptor (IL-6R) gene increases asthma risk and is predicted to decrease IL-6 classic signaling and increase IL-6 trans-signaling. This suggests that inhibition of IL-6 trans-signaling, but not classic signaling, might suppress allergic airway inflammation.
We sought to determine whether IL-6 signaling contributes to (1) acute experimental asthma induced by clinically relevant allergens and (2) variation in asthma clinical phenotypes in asthmatic patients.
Mice were sensitized to house dust mite (HDM) or cockroach at day 0, treated with IL-6R inhibitors at day 13, and challenged with the same allergen at days 14 to 17. End points were measured 3 hours after the final challenge. IL-6 and soluble IL-6 receptor (sIL-6R) expression in induced sputum of asthmatic patients was correlated with asthma clinical phenotypes.
Both HDM and cockroach induced a type 2/type 17 cytokine profile and mixed granulocytic inflammation in the airways. Both allergens increased IL-6 expression in the airways, but only cockroach induced sIL-6R expression. Therefore HDM challenge promoted IL-6 classic signaling but not trans-signaling; in this model treatment with anti-IL-6R did not suppress airway inflammation. In contrast, cockroach-induced inflammation involved activation of IL-6 trans-signaling and production of IL-17A by γδ T cells. Anti-IL-6R, selective blockade of sIL-6R, or γδ T-cell deficiency significantly attenuated cockroach-induced inflammation. Asthmatic patients with high airway IL-6 and sIL-6R levels were enriched for the neutrophilic and mixed granulocytic subtypes.
Experimental asthma associated with both high IL-6 and high sIL-6R levels in the airways is attenuated by treatment with IL-6R inhibitors.
白细胞介素 6 受体 (IL-6R) 基因的变异会增加哮喘的风险,并预计会降低 IL-6 经典信号转导,增加 IL-6 转信号转导。这表明抑制 IL-6 转信号转导,而不是经典信号转导,可能会抑制过敏性气道炎症。
我们试图确定 IL-6 信号是否有助于(1)由临床相关变应原引起的急性实验性哮喘,以及(2)哮喘患者哮喘临床表型的变化。
在第 0 天对小鼠进行屋尘螨(HDM)或蟑螂致敏,在第 13 天用 IL-6R 抑制剂治疗,并在第 14 至 17 天用相同的变应原进行攻击。在最后一次攻击后 3 小时测量终点。哮喘患者诱导痰中 IL-6 和可溶性 IL-6 受体(sIL-6R)的表达与哮喘临床表型相关。
HDM 和蟑螂均诱导气道中 2 型/17 型细胞因子谱和混合粒细胞炎症。两种变应原均增加了气道中 IL-6 的表达,但只有蟑螂诱导了 sIL-6R 的表达。因此,HDM 攻击促进了 IL-6 经典信号转导,但没有转信号转导;在该模型中,抗 IL-6R 治疗不能抑制气道炎症。相比之下,蟑螂诱导的炎症涉及 IL-6 转信号转导的激活和 γδ T 细胞产生 IL-17A。抗 IL-6R、选择性阻断 sIL-6R 或 γδ T 细胞缺陷显著减轻了蟑螂诱导的炎症。气道中 IL-6 和 sIL-6R 水平较高的哮喘患者中富含中性粒细胞和混合粒细胞亚型。
用 IL-6R 抑制剂治疗可减轻与气道中 IL-6 和 sIL-6R 水平均较高相关的实验性哮喘。