Nam Inkyeong, Shin Jin, Lee Yoseb, Lee Mi Young, Chung Yijung
Department of Physical Therapy, The Graduate School, Sahmyook University, Republic of Korea.
Department of Physical Therapy, Sahmyook University, Republic of Korea.
J Phys Ther Sci. 2015 Mar;27(3):571-3. doi: 10.1589/jpts.27.571. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
[Purpose] The aim of this study was to use surface electromyography (EMG) to investigate the effects of different foot positioning on bilateral erector spinae (ES) and gluteus maximus (GM) activation during sit-to-stand performed by individuals with stroke. [Subjects] Fifteen randomly selected participants with stroke were enrolled in this study. [Methods] All the participants were asked to perform sit-to-stand (STS) using three different strategies: (1) symmetric foot position, (2) unaffected foot placed behind the affected foot position (asymmetric-1), (3) affected foot placed behind the unaffected foot position (asymmetric-2). An EMG system was used to measure ES and GM muscle activities. The strategies were performed in a random order, and the mean values of five measurements were used in the analysis. One-way repeated measure ANOVA was used to determine the statistical significance of differences between the conditions. [Results] The affected ES muscle activity was significantly greater in asymmetric-2 (180.7±73.4) than in symmetrical foot placement (149.8±54.2). In addition, the affected ES, unaffected ES, and affected GM muscle activity were significantly greater in asymmetric-2 (180.7±73.4, 173.5±83.1, 98.3±90.3 respectively) than in asymmetric-1 foot placement (147.3±53.8, 151.2±76.5, 84.9±73.8 respectively). [Conclusion] Our results suggest that it may be more desirable for persons with stroke to place the affected foot behind the unaffected foot when performing STS to increase affected ES and GM muscle activation.
[目的] 本研究旨在运用表面肌电图(EMG),探究中风患者在从坐到站过程中,不同足部姿势对双侧竖脊肌(ES)和臀大肌(GM)激活的影响。[受试者] 本研究随机选取了15名中风患者。[方法] 所有参与者被要求采用三种不同策略进行从坐到站(STS)动作:(1)对称足部姿势;(2)患侧足置于健侧足后方的姿势(非对称-1);(3)健侧足置于患侧足后方的姿势(非对称-2)。使用肌电图系统测量竖脊肌和臀大肌的肌肉活动。这些策略以随机顺序进行,分析采用五次测量的平均值。采用单因素重复测量方差分析来确定不同条件之间差异的统计学显著性。[结果] 非对称-2姿势(180.7±73.4)下患侧竖脊肌的肌肉活动显著高于对称足部姿势(149.8±54.2)。此外,非对称-2姿势(分别为180.7±73.4、173.5±83.1、98.3±90.3)下患侧竖脊肌、健侧竖脊肌和患侧臀大肌的肌肉活动显著高于非对称-1姿势(分别为147.3±53.8、151.2±76.5、84.9±73.8)。[结论] 我们的结果表明,中风患者在进行从坐到站动作时,将患侧足置于健侧足后方可能更有利于增加患侧竖脊肌和臀大肌的肌肉激活。