Suppr超能文献

当急诊医生解读由训练有素的超声心动图医师获取的简化双视图超声心动图时,能否识别严重主动脉瓣狭窄?

Can severe aortic stenosis be identified by emergency physicians when interpreting a simplified two-view echocardiogram obtained by trained echocardiographers?

作者信息

Alzahrani Hasan, Woo Michael Y, Johnson Chris, Pageau Paul, Millington Scott, Thiruganasambandamoorthy Venkatesh

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Ottawa, 1053 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, ON K1Y 4E9 Canada.

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Ottawa, 1053 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, ON K1Y 4E9 Canada ; The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 40 Ruskin Street, Ottawa, Ontario K1Y 4W7 Canada.

出版信息

Crit Ultrasound J. 2015 Apr 18;7:5. doi: 10.1186/s13089-015-0022-8. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Aortic stenosis (AS) is a common valve problem that causes significant morbidity and mortality. The goal of this study was to determine whether an emergency physician (EP) could determine severe AS by reviewing only two B-mode echocardiographic views (parasternal long axis (PSLA) and parasternal short axis (PSSA)) obtained by trained echocardiographers.

METHODS

A convenience sample of 60 patients with no AS, mild/moderate AS or severe AS was selected for health record and echocardiogram review. The echocardiograms were performed in an accredited echocardiography laboratory. An EP blinded to the cardiologist's final report reviewed the PSLA and PSSA views after the cases were randomly sorted. Severe AS was defined as no cusp movement seen by the EP reviewers. A second EP independently reviewed 25% of randomly selected patients for inter-rater reliability. Collected data included patient demographics, EP interpretation and details of each echo view (quality, the number of cusps visualized, presence of calcification) and compared to final cardiology reports. Analyses included descriptive statistics, test characteristics for severe AS and kappa for agreement.

RESULTS

The mean age was 75.3 years (range 18 to 90) with 36.7% females. The cardiologist's diagnosis was as follows: 38.3% severe AS, 28.3% mild/moderate AS and 33.3% no AS. The PSSA view was poorer in quality compared with the PSLA (33.3% vs. 13.3%, p = 0.02), but the PSSA view was better than PSLA to visualize all three cusps (83.3% vs. 0%, p = 0.001). There was no difference in the presence of calcification between the mild/moderate and severe AS groups (94.1% vs. 100.0%, p = 0.46). The sensitivity and specificity for EP diagnosis of severe AS was 75.0% (95% CI 56.7% to 85.4%) and 92.5% (83.3% to 97.7%). The kappa for severe AS was 0.69 (0.41 to 0.85), and there was no significant difference between observers in the quality of the view, presence of aortic calcification and the number of cusps visible.

CONCLUSIONS

PSLA and PSSA views obtained by trained echocardiographers can be interpreted by an EP with appropriate training to identify severe AS with good specificity. Further larger prospective studies are required before widespread use by EPs.

摘要

背景

主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)是一种常见的瓣膜疾病,可导致严重的发病和死亡。本研究的目的是确定急诊医生(EP)能否仅通过查看由训练有素的超声心动图检查人员获得的两个B型超声心动图视图(胸骨旁长轴(PSLA)和胸骨旁短轴(PSSA))来诊断严重AS。

方法

选取60例无AS、轻度/中度AS或重度AS的患者作为便利样本,进行健康记录和超声心动图检查回顾。超声心动图检查在经认可的超声心动图实验室进行。一名对心脏病专家最终报告不知情的急诊医生在病例随机分类后查看PSLA和PSSA视图。重度AS被急诊医生定义为未见瓣叶运动。另一名急诊医生独立复查25%随机选取的患者,以评估评分者间的可靠性。收集的数据包括患者人口统计学信息、急诊医生的解读以及每个超声心动图视图的详细信息(质量、可见瓣叶数量、钙化情况),并与心脏病学最终报告进行比较。分析包括描述性统计、重度AS的检验特征以及一致性的kappa值。

结果

平均年龄为75.3岁(范围18至90岁),女性占36.7%。心脏病专家的诊断如下:38.3%为重度AS,28.3%为轻度/中度AS,33.3%无AS。与PSLA相比,PSSA视图的质量较差(33.3%对13.3%,p = 0.02),但PSSA视图在显示所有三个瓣叶方面优于PSLA(83.3%对0%,p = 0.001)。轻度/中度和重度AS组之间钙化情况无差异(94.1%对100.0%,p = 0.46)。急诊医生诊断重度AS的敏感性和特异性分别为75.0%(95%CI 56.7%至85.4%)和92.5%(83.3%至97.7%)。重度AS的kappa值为0.69(0.41至0.85),观察者在视图质量、主动脉钙化情况和可见瓣叶数量方面无显著差异。

结论

经过适当培训的急诊医生可以解读由训练有素的超声心动图检查人员获得的PSLA和PSSA视图,以较高的特异性识别重度AS。在急诊医生广泛使用之前,还需要进一步开展更大规模的前瞻性研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验