Truong Anh, Wu Peter, Diez-Barroso Ramon, Coverdale John
Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Acad Psychiatry. 2015 Oct;39(5):575-9. doi: 10.1007/s40596-015-0345-6. Epub 2015 May 2.
Because there are no formal reviews, the authors set out to identify and evaluate studies on teaching psychotherapy to psychiatry residents and medical students.
PubMed, Embase, and PsycINFO were searched for papers with outcomes on teaching psychotherapy. Search terms included psychotherapy, teaching, residents, medical students, supportive, psychodynamic, cognitive, behavioral, learning, training, skills, competency, and mentalization.
Nine studies were found that met inclusion criteria. There were seven studies of psychiatry residents and two of medical students. Only two of the research designs had comparison groups, and these were both randomized controlled trials, while seven of the other designs were pretest and posttest. Teaching methods, course content, and outcome measures varied widely across studies. Common methodological problems included a lack of control, low numbers of subjects as learners, and a lack of validity of the outcome measures. Only one of the studies was judged to be methodologically rigorous.
These findings establish a priority for undertaking additional rigorously designed studies in evaluating the teaching of psychotherapy to psychiatry residents and medical students.
由于缺乏正式的综述,作者着手识别和评估针对精神病学住院医师和医学生进行心理治疗教学的研究。
在PubMed、Embase和PsycINFO数据库中检索有关心理治疗教学成果的论文。检索词包括心理治疗、教学、住院医师、医学生、支持性、心理动力学、认知、行为、学习、培训、技能、能力和心理化。
发现9项研究符合纳入标准。其中7项是关于精神病学住院医师的研究,2项是关于医学生的研究。只有两项研究设计有对照组,且均为随机对照试验,其他7项设计为前后测。各研究的教学方法、课程内容和结果测量差异很大。常见的方法学问题包括缺乏对照、作为学习者的受试者数量少以及结果测量缺乏效度。只有一项研究被认为方法学严谨。
这些发现确定了开展更多设计严谨的研究以评估针对精神病学住院医师和医学生进行心理治疗教学的优先性。