• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Comparative Effectiveness of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Defibrillators Versus Standard Implantable Defibrillators in Medicare Patients.

作者信息

Zusterzeel Robbert, Caños Daniel A, Sanders William E, Silverman Henry, MaCurdy Thomas E, Worrall Christopher M, Kelman Jeffrey, Marinac-Dabic Danica, Strauss David G

机构信息

Center for Devices and Radiological Health, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.

Acumen, LLC, SafeRx, Burlingame, California.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2015 Jul 1;116(1):79-84. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.03.037. Epub 2015 Apr 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.03.037
PMID:25933736
Abstract

Previous analyses have shown that there is lower mortality with cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (CRT-D) in patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) but demonstrated mixed results in patients without LBBB. We evaluated the comparative effectiveness of CRT-D versus standard implantable defibrillators (ICDs) separately in patients with LBBB and right bundle branch block (RBBB) using Medicare claims data. Medicare records from CRT-D and ICD recipients from 2002 to 2009 that were followed up for up to 48 months were analyzed. We used propensity scores to match patients with ICD to those with CRT-D. In LBBB, 1:1 matching with replacement resulted in 54,218 patients with CRT-D and 20,763 with ICD, and in RBBB, 1:1 matching resulted in 7,298 patients with CRT-D and 7,298 with ICD. In LBBB, CRT-D had a 12% lower risk of heart failure hospitalization or death (hazard ratio [HR] 0.88, 95% confidence interval 0.86 to 0.90) and 5% lower death risk (HR 0.95, 0.92 to 0.97) compared with ICD. In RBBB, CRT-D had a 15% higher risk of heart failure hospitalization or death (HR 1.15, 1.10 to 1.20) and 13% higher death risk (HR 1.13, 1.07 to 1.18). Sensitivity analysis revealed that accounting for covariates not captured in the Medicare database may lead to increased benefit with CRT-D in LBBB and no difference in RBBB. In conclusion, in a large Medicare population, CRT-D was associated with lower mortality in LBBB but higher mortality in RBBB. The absence of certain covariates, in particular those that determine treatment selection, may affect the results of comparative effectiveness studies using claims data.

摘要

相似文献

1
Comparative Effectiveness of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Defibrillators Versus Standard Implantable Defibrillators in Medicare Patients.
Am J Cardiol. 2015 Jul 1;116(1):79-84. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.03.037. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
2
PR interval identifies clinical response in patients with non-left bundle branch block: a Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial-Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy substudy.PR 间期可预测非左束支传导阻滞患者的临床反应:多中心自动除颤器植入试验-心脏再同步治疗亚研究。
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014 Aug;7(4):645-51. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.113.001299. Epub 2014 Jun 24.
3
Cardiac resynchronization therapy in women versus men: observational comparative effectiveness study from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry.女性与男性的心脏再同步治疗:来自国家心血管数据登记处的观察性比较疗效研究。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2015 Mar;8(2 Suppl 1):S4-11. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.114.001548. Epub 2015 Feb 24.
4
Cardiac resynchronization therapy in women: US Food and Drug Administration meta-analysis of patient-level data.心脏再同步治疗在女性中的应用:美国食品和药物管理局患者水平数据的荟萃分析。
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Aug;174(8):1340-8. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.2717.
5
QRS axis and the benefit of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with mildly symptomatic heart failure enrolled in MADIT-CRT.QRS 轴与心脏再同步治疗对轻度症状心力衰竭患者的获益:MADIT-CRT 研究
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2013 Apr;24(4):442-8. doi: 10.1111/jce.12057. Epub 2012 Dec 17.
6
Cardiac Resynchronization Defibrillator Therapy for Nonspecific Intraventricular Conduction Delay Versus Right Bundle Branch Block.心脏再同步除颤器治疗非特异性室内传导延迟与右束支传导阻滞。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Jun 25;73(24):3082-3099. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.04.025.
7
The association between biventricular pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator efficacy when compared with implantable cardioverter defibrillator on outcomes and reverse remodelling.双心室起搏与心脏再同步治疗除颤器在疗效、预后和逆重构方面与植入式心脏复律除颤器的比较。
Eur Heart J. 2015 Feb 14;36(7):440-8. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu294. Epub 2014 Aug 11.
8
Left bundle branch block predicts better survival in women than men receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy: long-term follow-up of ∼ 145,000 patients.左束支传导阻滞预测女性心脏再同步治疗患者的生存率优于男性:约 145000 例患者的长期随访。
JACC Heart Fail. 2013 Jun;1(3):237-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2013.03.005. Epub 2013 Jun 3.
9
Ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation occurs less often in patients with left bundle branch block and combined resynchronization and defibrillators than in patients with narrow QRS and conventional defibrillators.与窄 QRS 波和传统除颤器相比,左束支传导阻滞和联合再同步除颤器的患者发生室性心动过速或心室颤动的情况较少。
Europace. 2012 Feb;14(2):224-9. doi: 10.1093/europace/eur307. Epub 2011 Sep 22.
10
Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators With Versus Without Resynchronization Therapy in Patients With a QRS Duration >180 ms.QRS时限>180毫秒的患者植入式心脏复律除颤器同步治疗与非同步治疗的比较
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Apr 25;69(16):2026-2036. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.02.042.