Floden Lysbeth, Howerter Amy, Matthews Eva, Nichter Mark, Cunningham James K, Ritenbaugh Cheryl, Gordon Judith S, Muramoto Myra L
Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Arizona College of Medicine, 1450 N. Cherry Avenue, Tucson, AZ, 85719, USA.
School of Anthropology, University of Arizona, 1009 E. South Campus Drive, Tucson, AZ, 85721, USA.
BMC Complement Altern Med. 2015 May 2;15:140. doi: 10.1186/s12906-015-0659-7.
Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use has steadily increased globally over the past two decades and is increasingly playing a role in the healthcare system in the United States. CAM practice-based effectiveness research requires an understanding of the settings in which CAM practitioners provide services. This paper describes and quantifies practice environment characteristics for a cross-sectional sample of doctors of chiropractic (DCs), licensed acupuncturists (LAcs), and licensed massage therapists (LMTs) in the United States.
Using a cross-sectional telephone survey of DCs (n = 32), LAcs (n = 70), and LMTs (n = 184) in the Tucson, AZ metropolitan area, we collected data about each location where practitioners work, as well as measures on practitioner and practice characteristics including: patient volume, number of locations where practitioners worked, CAM practitioner types working at each location, and business models of practice.
The majority of practitioners reported having one practice location (93.8% of DCs, 80% of LAcs and 59.8% of LMTs) where they treat patients. Patient volume/week was related to practitioner type; DCs saw 83.13 (SD = 49.29) patients/week, LAcs saw 22.29 (SD = 16.88) patients/week, and LMTs saw 14.21 (SD =10.25) patients per week. Practitioners completed surveys for N = 388 practice locations. Many CAM practices were found to be multidisciplinary and/or have more than one practitioner: 9/35 (25.7%) chiropractic practices, 24/87 (27.6%) acupuncture practices, and 141/266 (53.0%) massage practices. Practice business models across CAM practitioner types were heterogeneous, e.g. sole proprietor, employee, partner, and independent contractor.
CAM practices vary across and within disciplines in ways that can significantly impact design and implementation of practice-based research. CAM research and intervention programs need to be mindful of the heterogeneity of CAM practices in order to create appropriate interventions, study designs, and implementation plans.
在过去二十年中,全球范围内补充和替代医学(CAM)的使用稳步增加,并且在美国的医疗保健系统中发挥着越来越重要的作用。基于补充和替代医学实践的有效性研究需要了解补充和替代医学从业者提供服务的环境。本文描述并量化了美国整脊疗法医生(DCs)、持牌针灸师(LAcs)和持牌按摩治疗师(LMTs)横断面样本的执业环境特征。
通过对亚利桑那州图森市大都市区的整脊疗法医生(n = 32)、持牌针灸师(n = 70)和持牌按摩治疗师(n = 184)进行横断面电话调查,我们收集了有关从业者工作的每个地点的数据,以及关于从业者和执业特征的测量数据,包括:患者数量、从业者工作的地点数量、每个地点工作的补充和替代医学从业者类型以及执业商业模式。
大多数从业者报告称有一个治疗患者的执业地点(93.8%的整脊疗法医生、80%的持牌针灸师和59.8%的持牌按摩治疗师)。每周的患者数量与从业者类型有关;整脊疗法医生每周接待83.13名(标准差 = 49.29)患者,持牌针灸师每周接待22.29名(标准差 = 16.88)患者,持牌按摩治疗师每周接待14.21名(标准差 = 10.25)患者。从业者完成了对N = 388个执业地点的调查。发现许多补充和替代医学执业是多学科的和/或有不止一名从业者:9/35(25.7%)的整脊疗法执业、24/87(27.6%)的针灸执业和141/266(53.0%)的按摩执业。不同类型补充和替代医学从业者的执业商业模式各不相同,例如独资经营者、雇员、合伙人以及独立承包商。
补充和替代医学执业在不同学科之间以及学科内部存在差异,这些差异会对基于实践的研究的设计和实施产生重大影响。补充和替代医学研究及干预项目需要注意补充和替代医学执业的异质性,以便制定合适的干预措施、研究设计和实施计划。