Stiel Stephanie, Heckel Maria, Bussmann Sonja, Weber Martin, Ostgathe Christoph
Department of Palliative Medicine, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen, Krankenhausstraße 12, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Comprehensive Cancer Centre, CCC Erlangen - EMN, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
BMC Palliat Care. 2015 May 2;14:21. doi: 10.1186/s12904-015-0020-4.
One essential element of research is the successful recruitment of participants. However, concerns are obvious regarding the ethical implications of involving terminally ill and even dying patients and their informal caregivers as research participants. This study aims to illustrate central issues encountered when recruiting bereaved informal caregivers for a questionnaire validation study on the quality of dying and death.
Between July 2012 and November 2013, informal caregivers of deceased inpatients who were treated at two palliative care units in Germany were invited to participate in a questionnaire validation study. Informal caregivers were called by a trained researcher at the end of the fourth week after death at the earliest and by the sixteenth week after death at the latest and asked to participate in a face-to-face interview in their private home.
The overall participation rate of all eligible informal caregivers was 76.1% (226/297). The mean burden score was 2.5 (NRS from 0=no burden to 10=maximum burden; n=221). Higher burden scores (≥4) were associated with emotional and burdensome memories (n=34) being invoked throughout the interview. Severe or maximum burden scores (≥7) were stated by 13.2% of participants. The average time between the associated patient's death and the informal caregiver's interview was 57.3 days (range 26-176 days, median 49.5 days). 5.3% of all 226 interviews were not completed due to different reasons. Participants' comments on the way in which the study was conducted gave insight into their motivation to take part in the study and their evaluation of the interview situation.
The recruitment strategy can be recommended to other researchers developing research with bereaved carers. The burden caused by study participation was acceptable to the researchers carrying out this research, although a small group of participants experienced high levels of burden which should be anticipated and appropriate support services offered. Family caregivers are willing to support end-of-life care research, have different motivations for participation and even reported benefits from participation. Nevertheless, study designs have to take into account and ease the potential burden of interviews for caregivers experiencing grief.
研究的一个关键要素是成功招募参与者。然而,对于将绝症患者甚至濒死患者及其非正式照料者纳入研究参与者所涉及的伦理问题,人们的担忧显而易见。本研究旨在阐述在为一项关于死亡质量的问卷验证研究招募丧亲非正式照料者时遇到的核心问题。
2012年7月至2013年11月期间,邀请了在德国两个姑息治疗病房接受治疗的已故住院患者的非正式照料者参与一项问卷验证研究。最早在患者死亡后的第四周结束时,最晚在患者死亡后的第十六周,由一名经过培训的研究人员致电非正式照料者,邀请他们在其家中进行面对面访谈。
所有符合条件的非正式照料者的总体参与率为76.1%(226/297)。平均负担评分为2.5(数字评定量表,从0=无负担到10=最大负担;n=221)。较高的负担评分(≥4)与访谈过程中引发的情感和沉重记忆(n=34)相关。13.2%的参与者表示负担严重或达到最大负担评分(≥7)。相关患者死亡与非正式照料者接受访谈之间的平均时间为57.3天(范围26 - 176天,中位数49.5天)。在所有226次访谈中,5.3%因不同原因未完成。参与者对研究开展方式的评论揭示了他们参与研究的动机以及对访谈情况的评价。
该招募策略可供其他针对丧亲照料者开展研究的研究人员参考。尽管一小部分参与者经历了较高程度的负担,对此应有所预期并提供适当的支持服务,但本研究的参与者所感受到的参与研究带来的负担对开展此项研究的研究人员而言是可以接受的。家庭照料者愿意支持临终关怀研究,他们参与的动机各不相同,甚至表示参与研究有所收获。然而,研究设计必须考虑并减轻经历悲痛的照料者在访谈中可能承受的潜在负担。