Ullrich Anneke, Ascherfeld Lilian, Marx Gabriella, Bokemeyer Carsten, Bergelt Corinna, Oechsle Karin
Department of Oncology, Haematology and Bone Marrow Transplant, Palliative Care Unit, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
BMC Palliat Care. 2017 May 10;16(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12904-017-0206-z.
This pilot study aimed to investigate quality of life, psychological burden, unmet needs, and care satisfaction in family caregivers of advanced cancer patients (FCs) during specialized inpatient palliative care (SIPC) and to test feasibility and acceptance of the questionnaire survey.
During a period of 12 weeks, FCs were recruited consecutively within 72 h after the patient's admission. They completed validated scales on several outcomes: quality of life (SF-8), distress (DT), anxiety (GAD-7), depression (PHQ-9), supportive needs (FIN), palliative care outcome (POS), and satisfaction with care (FAMCARE-2). We used non-parametric tests, t-tests and correlation analyses to address our research questions.
FCs showed high study commitment: 74 FCs were asked to participate whereof 54 (73%) agreed and 51 (69%) returned the questionnaire. Except for "bodily pain", FCs' quality of life (SF-8) was impaired in all subscales. Most FCs (96%) reported clinically significant own distress (DT), with sadness, sorrows and exhaustion being the most distressing problems (80-83%). Moderate to severe anxiety (GAD-7) and depression (PHQ-9) were prevalent in 43% and 41% of FCs, respectively. FCs scored a mean number of 16.3 of 20 needs (FIN) as very or extremely important (SD 3.3), 20% of needs were unmet in >50% of FCs. The mean POS score assessed by FCs was 16.6 (SD 5.0) and satisfaction (FAMCARE-2) was high (73.4; SD 8.3).
This pilot study demonstrated feasibility of the questionnaire survey and showed relevant psychosocial burden and unmet needs in FCs during SIPC. However, FCs' satisfaction with SIPC seemed to be high. A current multicenter study evaluates these findings longitudinally in a large cohort of FCs.
这项试点研究旨在调查晚期癌症患者家庭照顾者(FCs)在专科住院姑息治疗(SIPC)期间的生活质量、心理负担、未满足的需求和护理满意度,并测试问卷调查的可行性和可接受性。
在12周的时间内,在患者入院后72小时内连续招募FCs。他们完成了关于几个结果的有效量表:生活质量(SF-8)、痛苦(DT)、焦虑(GAD-7)、抑郁(PHQ-9)、支持性需求(FIN)、姑息治疗结果(POS)和护理满意度(FAMCARE-2)。我们使用非参数检验、t检验和相关分析来解决我们的研究问题。
FCs表现出很高的研究参与度:74名FCs被邀请参与,其中54名(73%)同意,51名(69%)返回了问卷。除了“身体疼痛”外,FCs的生活质量(SF-8)在所有子量表中均受损。大多数FCs(96%)报告有临床上显著的自身痛苦(DT),悲伤、悲痛和疲惫是最令人痛苦的问题(80-83%)。中度至重度焦虑(GAD-7)和抑郁(PHQ-9)分别在43%和41%的FCs中普遍存在。FCs在20项需求(FIN)中平均有16.3项被评为非常或极其重要(标准差3.3),20%的需求在超过50%的FCs中未得到满足。FCs评估的平均POS评分为16.6(标准差5.0),满意度(FAMCARE-2)较高(73.4;标准差8.3)。
这项试点研究证明了问卷调查具有可行性,并显示了SIPC期间FCs存在相关的心理社会负担和未满足的需求。然而,FCs对SIPC的满意度似乎较高。目前的一项多中心研究正在对一大群FCs进行纵向评估这些发现。