Suppr超能文献

指甲矫正器作为嵌甲的替代治疗方法:与Winograd技术比较的结果

Nail Braces as an Alternative Treatment for Ingrown Toenails: Results From a Comparison With the Winograd Technique.

作者信息

Guler Olcay, Tuna Hamide, Mahirogullari Mahir, Erdil Mehmet, Mutlu Serhat, Isyar Mehmet

机构信息

Assistant Professor, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Medipol University, Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey.

Dermatologist, Department of Dermatology, Nisa Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

J Foot Ankle Surg. 2015 Jul-Aug;54(4):620-4. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2015.04.013. Epub 2015 Apr 27.

Abstract

Ingrown toenails are one of the most frequent nail disorders and can be treated with conservative or surgical approaches. Although discovered a long time ago, the available data are still very limited on the potential effectiveness of nail braces for ingrown toenail treatment. In the present retrospective study, we compared nail braces with surgical wedge excision using the Winograd technique with respect to the time to return to work, recurrence, interval to recurrence, and patient satisfaction. A total of 159 patients were divided into the nail brace (n = 74; mean age 29.51 ± 8.48 years) and Winograd technique (n = 85; mean age 26.95 ± 8.06 years) groups. In the nail brace group, the mean time to return to work (4.15 ± 1.07 days) was significantly shorter than that in the Winograd technique group (13.8 ± 2.26 days; p < .001). Patient satisfaction was significantly greater in the nail brace group (94.6%) compared with the Winograd technique group (82.4%; p = .018). Of the 159 patients, 6 (8.1%) in the nail brace group and 8 (9.4%) in the Winograd technique group developed recurrence; however, this difference was not statistically significant (p > .05). A statistically significant difference was observed in the mean interval to recurrence (12.46 ± 1.60 versus 13.24 ± 2.48 months, respectively; p = .031). The progression-free follow-up periods for the nail brace and Winograd technique groups were 15.45 ± 0.22 months (95% confidence interval 15.02 to 15.88) and 17.18 ± 0.29 months (95% confidence interval 16.61 to 17.84), respectively. We have concluded that the use of nail braces is an appropriate alternative treatment of ingrown toenails with high patient satisfaction, fast recovery times, and a low recurrence rate.

摘要

嵌甲是最常见的指甲疾病之一,可以采用保守或手术方法进行治疗。尽管嵌甲问题早已被发现,但关于指甲矫正器治疗嵌甲潜在效果的现有数据仍然非常有限。在本回顾性研究中,我们比较了指甲矫正器与采用维诺格拉德技术进行手术楔形切除术在恢复工作时间、复发情况、复发间隔以及患者满意度方面的差异。总共159名患者被分为指甲矫正器组(n = 74;平均年龄29.51 ± 8.48岁)和维诺格拉德技术组(n = 85;平均年龄26.95 ± 8.06岁)。在指甲矫正器组,恢复工作的平均时间(4.15 ± 1.07天)明显短于维诺格拉德技术组(13.8 ± 2.26天;p < .001)。与维诺格拉德技术组(82.4%;p = .018)相比,指甲矫正器组的患者满意度明显更高(94.6%)。在这159名患者中,指甲矫正器组有6名(8.1%)出现复发,维诺格拉德技术组有8名(9.4%)出现复发;然而,这种差异无统计学意义(p > .05)。在复发平均间隔方面观察到有统计学意义的差异(分别为12.46 ± 1.60个月和13.24 ± 2.48个月;p = .031)。指甲矫正器组和维诺格拉德技术组的无进展随访期分别为15.45 ± 0.22个月(95%置信区间15.02至15.88)和17.18 ± 0.29个月(95%置信区间16.61至17.84)。我们得出结论,使用指甲矫正器是治疗嵌甲的一种合适替代方法,患者满意度高、恢复时间快且复发率低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验