Suppr超能文献

温诺格拉德法与电凝温诺格拉德法治疗嵌甲的对比

Winograd Method Versus Winograd Method With Electrocoagulation in the Treatment of Ingrown Toenails.

作者信息

Acar Erdinc

机构信息

Orthopedist and Hand Surgeon, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Hand and Upper Extremity Surgery Division, Konya Necmettin Erbakan University Meram School of Medicine, Konya, Turkey.

出版信息

J Foot Ankle Surg. 2017 May-Jun;56(3):474-477. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2017.01.010. Epub 2017 Feb 24.

Abstract

An important component of the Winograd surgical method for an ingrown toenail is total excision of the associated germinal matrix. However, this might not always be accomplished with the procedure. We hypothesized that the surgical results might be improved by adding electrocoagulation of the germinal matrix to the Winograd method. The objective of the present study was to compare the recurrence, satisfaction, and complication rates of the Winograd method with those of the Winograd method with electrocoagulation. We retrospectively evaluated the records of 102 patients with single Heifetz stage 2 or 3 ingrown toenails who had undergone surgery from January 2013 to October 2014 using 1 of these 2 methods. Of the 102 patients, 50 (49%) underwent the Winograd method and 52 (51%) underwent the Winograd method with electrocoagulation. The mean follow-up period of our patients was 12 (range 6 to 22) months. An ingrown toenail recurred in 3 patients (6%) in the Winograd group and in no patient in the Winograd with electrocoagulation group (p = .04). Among the patients in the Winograd group, 46 (92.0%) were satisfied or very satisfied. Among the patients in the Winograd plus electrocoagulation group, 49 (94.2%) were satisfied or very satisfied (p = .04). No complications developed in either group. In conclusion, the Winograd method for ingrown toenails results in high satisfaction rates, low recurrence rates, and low complication rates. The addition of electrocoagulation of the germinal matrix to the Winograd method could result in even lower recurrence rates, while maintaining high patient satisfaction and without increasing the risk of complications.

摘要

温诺格拉德(Winograd)嵌甲手术方法的一个重要组成部分是彻底切除相关的生发基质。然而,该手术过程可能并非总能做到这一点。我们推测,在温诺格拉德方法中增加生发基质电凝术可能会改善手术效果。本研究的目的是比较温诺格拉德方法与温诺格拉德电凝术的复发率、满意度和并发症发生率。我们回顾性评估了2013年1月至2014年10月期间使用这两种方法之一进行手术的102例单发海费茨(Heifetz)2期或3期嵌甲患者的记录。102例患者中,50例(49%)接受了温诺格拉德方法,52例(51%)接受了温诺格拉德电凝术。我们患者的平均随访期为12个月(范围6至22个月)。温诺格拉德组有3例患者(6%)复发嵌甲,而温诺格拉德电凝术组无患者复发(p = 0.04)。在温诺格拉德组患者中,46例(92.0%)满意或非常满意。在温诺格拉德加电凝术组患者中,49例(94.2%)满意或非常满意(p = 0.04)。两组均未出现并发症。总之,温诺格拉德嵌甲手术方法导致高满意度、低复发率和低并发症发生率。在温诺格拉德方法中增加生发基质电凝术可导致更低的复发率,同时保持高患者满意度且不增加并发症风险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验