Maier Michael W, Kuhs Felix, Streit Marcus R, Schuhmacher Peter, Walker Tilman, Ewerbeck Volker, Gotterbarm Tobias
Clinic for Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Schlierbacher Landstrasse 200a, 69118, Heidelberg, Germany,
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2015 Aug;135(8):1169-75. doi: 10.1007/s00402-015-2236-4. Epub 2015 May 5.
While the classical indications and contraindications for unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA) are widely accepted there is not yet consensus if patients with partial thickness cartilage loss (PTCL) are equally suited for treatment with UKA. The aim of our study was to determine if patients with partial thickness cartilage loss do equally well after treatment with UKA.
The study retrospectively analyzed the clinical results as well as the survival rates of 64 patients treated with UKA with the medial Oxford knee system. 32 patients had shown PTCL on preoperative radiographs, while the matched control group presented with full thickness cartilage loss (FTCL) medially. Outcome parameters were the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), the American Knee Society Score (AKS), and radiographic analysis.
Postoperative improvement in OKS was 16 (SD 9.0) for patients with PTCL and 17 (SD 8.1) for patients with FTCL. There were no significant differences in the clinical scores between the two groups. Five Patients with PTCL had reoperation whereas there were only two in the bone on bone group. Cumulative survival at 5 years for all revisions was 84 % (95 % CI 72-92 %) for the PTCL group and 97 % (95 % CI 92-100 %) for the FTCL group. This difference was not yet significant (log rank: p = 0.095).
Patients with PTCL are not equally suited for treatment with UKA like patients with bone on bone. Although PTCL has equal clinical results, it was associated with higher revision rates in our series.
虽然单髁膝关节置换术(UKA)的经典适应证和禁忌证已被广泛接受,但对于部分厚度软骨损伤(PTCL)的患者是否同样适合接受UKA治疗,目前尚无共识。我们研究的目的是确定部分厚度软骨损伤的患者接受UKA治疗后效果是否相同。
本研究回顾性分析了64例采用内侧牛津膝关节系统进行UKA治疗患者的临床结果及生存率。32例患者术前X线片显示有PTCL,而匹配的对照组内侧为全层软骨损伤(FTCL)。观察指标包括牛津膝关节评分(OKS)、美国膝关节协会评分(AKS)以及影像学分析。
PTCL患者术后OKS改善值为16(标准差9.0),FTCL患者为17(标准差8.1)。两组临床评分无显著差异。5例PTCL患者进行了再次手术,而骨对骨组仅有2例。PTCL组所有翻修患者5年累积生存率为84%(95%可信区间72 - 92%),FTCL组为97%(95%可信区间92 - 100%)。这种差异尚无统计学意义(对数秩检验:p = 0.095)。
与骨对骨的患者相比,PTCL患者并不同样适合接受UKA治疗。尽管PTCL患者有相同的临床结果,但在我们的系列研究中其翻修率较高。