• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项针对患有多种疾病个体的巴塞罗那家庭护理项目的成本效益分析。

Cost-effectiveness of a Barcelona home care program for individuals with multimorbidity.

作者信息

Vilà Anna, Villegas Eulàlia, Cruanyes Jordi, Delgado Rosa, Sabaté Rosa-Ana, Ortega Josep, Araguás Cristina, Humet Carlos

机构信息

Program for the Care of Patients with Multimorbidity, Hospital de Barcelona SCIAS, Grup Assistència, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015 May;63(5):1017-24. doi: 10.1111/jgs.13396. Epub 2015 May 4.

DOI:10.1111/jgs.13396
PMID:25940863
Abstract

To improve the efficiency and effectiveness of care and optimize healthcare resources, a home healthcare program was created for individuals with multiple chronic conditions. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the 261 individuals (mean age 84) included in the program from its inception in 2011 through 2013 (mean stay in the program 203±192 days) were prospectively analyzed. The number of hospital admissions, length of stay, and costs for individuals admitted to the program were compared for two time periods: the 6 months before admission to the program and their stay in the program. After admission to the program, the number of hospital admissions and the hospital length of stay per person per month decreased from 0.36±0.21 to 0.19±0.52 (P<.001) and from 3.5 to 1 day (P<.001), respectively. Surveys of randomly selected patients and caregivers showed high satisfaction with the program. Costs per person per day decreased from €54.65 (US$73.12) to €17.91 (US$23.96), a reduction of 67.1%. Fewer admissions and shorter hospital stays enabled the hospital to eliminate one acute bed for every 50 individuals admitted to the program. In conclusion, home care for individuals with chronic illness with multimorbidity reduced the number of hospital admissions and length of stay, resulting in good patient satisfaction and lower costs.

摘要

为提高护理效率和效果并优化医疗资源,为患有多种慢性病的个体创建了一项家庭医疗保健计划。对2011年至2013年该计划启动以来纳入的261名个体(平均年龄84岁)的人口统计学和临床特征进行了前瞻性分析(在该计划中的平均停留时间为203±192天)。比较了两个时间段内纳入该计划的个体的住院次数、住院时间和费用:纳入该计划前的6个月以及他们在该计划中的停留时间。纳入该计划后,每人每月的住院次数和住院时间分别从0.36±0.21降至0.19±0.52(P<0.001),从3.5天降至1天(P<0.001)。对随机选择的患者和护理人员的调查显示对该计划高度满意。每人每天的费用从54.65欧元(73.12美元)降至17.91欧元(23.96美元),降低了67.1%。住院次数减少和住院时间缩短使医院能够为每50名纳入该计划的个体腾出一张急性病床。总之,对患有多种慢性病的个体进行家庭护理减少了住院次数和住院时间,带来了良好的患者满意度并降低了成本。

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of a Barcelona home care program for individuals with multimorbidity.一项针对患有多种疾病个体的巴塞罗那家庭护理项目的成本效益分析。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015 May;63(5):1017-24. doi: 10.1111/jgs.13396. Epub 2015 May 4.
2
Commercial enteral formulas and nutrition support teams improve the outcome of home enteral tube feeding.商业性肠内配方和营养支持团队改善了家庭肠内管饲的结局。
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2011 May;35(3):380-5. doi: 10.1177/0148607110378860.
3
Cost-effectiveness of home-based care versus hospital care for chronically ill tuberculosis patients, Francistown, Botswana.博茨瓦纳弗朗西斯敦地区慢性病结核病患者居家护理与住院护理的成本效益分析
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2003 Sep;7(9 Suppl 1):S80-5.
4
Extending the horizon in chronic heart failure: effects of multidisciplinary, home-based intervention relative to usual care.拓展慢性心力衰竭的治疗视野:多学科居家干预相对于常规护理的效果
Circulation. 2006 Dec 5;114(23):2466-73. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.638122. Epub 2006 Nov 20.
5
Impact of home versus clinic-based management of chronic heart failure: the WHICH? (Which Heart Failure Intervention Is Most Cost-Effective & Consumer Friendly in Reducing Hospital Care) multicenter, randomized trial.家庭与诊所管理慢性心力衰竭的影响:WHICH 研究(心力衰竭干预措施在降低住院率方面的成本效益和患者友好度评估)多中心、随机试验
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Oct 2;60(14):1239-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.06.025.
6
Is home-based palliative care cost-effective? An economic evaluation of the Palliative Care Extended Packages at Home (PEACH) pilot.居家姑息治疗具有成本效益吗?居家姑息治疗扩展包(PEACH)试点项目的经济评估。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2013 Dec;3(4):431-5. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2012-000361. Epub 2013 Jun 21.
7
The health and cost effects of substituting home care for inpatient acute care: a review of the evidence.用家庭护理替代住院急性护理的健康和成本影响:证据综述。
CMAJ. 1999 Apr 20;160(8):1151-5.
8
Decreased hospital utilization by older adults attributable to a home hospitalization program.因居家住院计划导致老年人住院率降低。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1996 May;44(5):591-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1996.tb01449.x.
9
The impact of a new emergency admission avoidance system for older people on length of stay and same-day discharges.新的老年人急诊入院回避系统对住院时间和当日出院的影响。
Age Ageing. 2014 Jan;43(1):116-21. doi: 10.1093/ageing/aft086. Epub 2013 Aug 1.
10
Relationship of nutritional status to length of stay, hospital costs, and discharge status of patients hospitalized in the medicine service.内科住院患者营养状况与住院时间、住院费用及出院状态的关系。
J Am Diet Assoc. 1997 Sep;97(9):975-8; quiz 979-80. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8223(97)00235-6.

引用本文的文献

1
[Morbidity and use of healthcare resources of people in Primary Home Care].[初级家庭护理中人群的发病率及医疗资源利用情况]
Aten Primaria. 2025 Jun 21;57(11):103276. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2025.103276.
2
Comprehensive geriatric hospital-at-home increases the days at home in older adults compared to bed-based intermediate care: a propensity score matching analysis.与基于床位的中期护理相比,综合老年居家医院护理可增加老年人的居家天数:一项倾向评分匹配分析。
Age Ageing. 2025 May 31;54(6). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaf162.
3
Stakeholders' perspectives on the necessary requirements of implementing the Hospital-at-Home program: a qualitative study.
利益相关者对实施居家医院项目必要要求的看法:一项定性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 May 8;25(1):656. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12800-y.
4
Cost-effectiveness of home care compared to hospital care in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): a systematic review.慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者家庭护理与医院护理的成本效益:一项系统评价
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Oct 3;11:1405840. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1405840. eCollection 2024.
5
Factors Associated with Preferred Place of Care and Death in Patients with Parkinson's Disease: A Cross-Sectional Study.与帕金森病患者首选照护地点和死亡相关的因素:一项横断面研究。
J Parkinsons Dis. 2024;14(3):589-599. doi: 10.3233/JPD-230311.
6
Study of a Quasi-Experimental Trial to Compare Two Models of Home Care for the Elderly in an Urban Primary Care Setting in Spain: Results of Intermediate Analysis.在西班牙城市基层医疗环境下比较两种老年家庭护理模式的准实验试验研究:中期分析结果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 17;19(4):2329. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19042329.
7
Asian Attitudes and Perceptions Toward Hospital-At-Home: A Cross-Sectional Study.亚洲人对家庭医院的态度和看法:一项横断面研究。
Front Public Health. 2021 Jul 23;9:704465. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.704465. eCollection 2021.
8
Indicators of home-based hospitalization model and strategies for its implementation: a systematic review of reviews.基于家庭的住院模式指标及其实施策略:系统评价综述。
Syst Rev. 2020 Aug 8;9(1):172. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01423-5.
9
Impact of a home health care program for disabled patients in Taiwan: A nationwide population-based cohort study.台湾居家照护计划对残疾患者的影响:一项基于全国人口的队列研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Feb;98(7):e14502. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014502.
10
Effectiveness of Intensive Primary Care Interventions: A Systematic Review.强化初级保健干预措施的效果:系统评价。
J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Dec;32(12):1377-1386. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4174-z. Epub 2017 Sep 18.