Anderson Kate, Boisvert Michelle K, Doneski-Nicol Janis, Gutmann Michelle L, Hall Nerissa C, Morelock Cynthia, Steele Richard, Cohn Ellen R
University of Sydney, Australia.
University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA.
Int J Telerehabil. 2012 Dec 9;4(2):79-82. doi: 10.5195/IJT.2012.6106. eCollection 2012 Fall.
Approximately 1.3% of all people, or about 4 million Americans, cannot rely on their natural speech to meet their daily communication needs. Telepractice offers a potentially cost-effective service delivery mechanism to provide clinical AAC services at a distance to the benefit of underserved populations in the United States and worldwide. Tele-AAC is a unique cross-disciplinary clinical service delivery model that requires expertise in both telepractice and augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) systems. The Tele-AAC Working Group of the 2012 ISAAC Research Symposium therefore drafted a resolution underscoring the importance of identifying and characterizing the unique opportunities and constraints of Tele-AAC in all aspects of service delivery. These include, but are not limited to: needs assessments; implementation planning; device/system procurement, set-up and training; quality assurance, client progress monitoring, and follow-up service delivery. Tele-AAC, like other telepractice applications, requires adherence to the ASHA Code of Ethics and other policy documents, and state, federal, and international laws, as well as a competent technological infrastructure. The Working Group recommends that institutions of higher education and professional organizations provide training in Tele-AAC service provision. In addition, research and development are needed to create validity measures across Tele-AAC practices (i.e., assessment, implementation, and consultation); determine the communication competence levels achieved by Tele-AAC users; discern stakeholders' perceptions of Tele-AAC services (e.g., acceptability and viability); maximize Tele-AAC's capacity to engage multiple team members in AAC assessment and ongoing service; identify the limitations and barriers of Tele-AAC provision; and develop potential solutions.
约1.3%的人,即约400万美国人,无法依靠其正常言语来满足日常交流需求。远程医疗提供了一种潜在的具有成本效益的服务提供机制,可远距离提供临床辅助沟通(AAC)服务,造福美国及全球未得到充分服务的人群。远程AAC是一种独特的跨学科临床服务提供模式,需要远程医疗及辅助和替代沟通(AAC)系统方面的专业知识。因此,2012年国际辅助和替代沟通学会(ISAAC)研究研讨会的远程AAC工作组起草了一项决议,强调在服务提供的各个方面识别和描述远程AAC的独特机遇和限制的重要性。这些方面包括但不限于:需求评估;实施规划;设备/系统采购、设置和培训;质量保证、客户进展监测及后续服务提供。与其他远程医疗应用一样,远程AAC需要遵守美国言语语言听力协会(ASHA)的道德规范及其他政策文件,以及州、联邦和国际法律,还需要有完善的技术基础设施。工作组建议高等教育机构和专业组织提供远程AAC服务提供方面的培训。此外,还需要进行研究和开发,以制定适用于各种远程AAC实践(即评估、实施和咨询)的有效性衡量标准;确定远程AAC用户所达到的沟通能力水平;了解利益相关者对远程AAC服务的看法(如可接受性和可行性);最大限度地发挥远程AAC让多个团队成员参与AAC评估和持续服务的能力;识别远程AAC提供过程中的限制和障碍;并制定潜在的解决方案。