*Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, †Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Division of Cytology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA.
J Low Genit Tract Dis. 1999 Jan;3(1):19-24. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-0976.1999.08080.x.
We sought to determine the safety and efficacy of a bipolar electrosurgical loop excision instrument in the diagnosis and treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN).
Twenty-eight patients underwent treatment for CIN using a 20 x 10-mm bipolar electrosurgical loop device (Valley Forge Scientific, Oaks, PA). A Malis (Valley Forge Scientific) electrosurgical generator unit (60 watts cutting) was used to remove the cervical lesion and transformation zone under colposcopic guidance. Specimens were evaluated for histopathological diagnosis, tissue depth, fragmentation of specimens, mean maximal thermal artifact, and mean maximal endocervical and ectocervical thermal artifact.
Final pathology from bipolar electrosurgical loop excision revealed CIN3 (8), CIN2 (4), CIN1 (11), human papillomavirus changes (3), and normal findings (2). Mean operating time was less than 15 minutes, and mean estimated blood loss was less than 10 ml. Average number of tissue pieces was 1.6 (range, 1-4). No complications occurred. Mean maximal thermal artifact was 0.318 mm. Mean endocervical mucosal and ectocervical mucosal thermal artifacts were 0.177 mm and 0.176 mm, respectively. Mean tissue depth of the excised specimen was 0.40 cm. Histopathological diagnosis was possible on all specimens. In five specimens (17.9%), evaluation of the cauterized endocervical margin for CIN was not possible, owing to thermal artifact. No correlation was observed between tissue depth and thermal artifact.
Bipolar electrosurgical loop excision for the treatment of CIN is a safe and effective alternative to the traditional unipolar electrosurgical loop excision. Thermal artifact did not interfere with histopathological diagnosis, and the presence of artifact at cauterized margins was similar to that reported for historically unipolar specimens. A randomized control trial comparing therapeutic effectiveness of bipolar electrosurgical loop excision and unipolar electrosurgical loop excision is planned.
我们旨在确定双极电切环切除术在诊断和治疗宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN)中的安全性和有效性。
28 例患者采用 20×10mm 双极电切环装置(宾夕法尼亚州橡树谷福吉谷科学公司)治疗 CIN。使用 Malis(谷福吉谷科学公司)电外科发生器单元(60 瓦切割)在阴道镜指导下切除宫颈病变和转化区。标本进行组织病理学诊断、组织深度、标本碎片、平均最大热损伤、平均最大宫颈内口和宫颈外口热损伤评估。
双极电切环切除的最终病理显示 CIN3(8 例)、CIN2(4 例)、CIN1(11 例)、人乳头瘤病毒改变(3 例)和正常发现(2 例)。平均手术时间少于 15 分钟,平均估计失血量少于 10ml。组织块的平均数量为 1.6 个(范围 1-4 个)。无并发症发生。最大平均热损伤为 0.318mm。宫颈内口黏膜和宫颈外口黏膜的平均热损伤分别为 0.177mm 和 0.176mm。切除标本的平均组织深度为 0.40cm。所有标本均可进行组织病理学诊断。在 5 例标本(17.9%)中,由于热损伤,无法评估电切宫颈内口边缘的 CIN。未观察到组织深度与热损伤之间的相关性。
双极电切环切除术治疗 CIN 是传统单极电切环切除术的一种安全有效的替代方法。热损伤不干扰组织病理学诊断,电切边缘的热损伤与历史上单极标本报告的相似。计划进行一项比较双极电切环切除术和单极电切环切除术治疗效果的随机对照试验。