Aykan Hayrettin Hakan, Özer Sema, Karagöz Tevfik, Akın Alper, Gülgün Mustafa, Alehan Dursun, Özkutlu Süheyla, Çeliker Alpay
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ihsan Doğramacı Childrens Hospital, 06100, Samanpazari, Ankara, Turkey.
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Acıbadem University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Pediatr Cardiol. 2015 Oct;36(7):1429-35. doi: 10.1007/s00246-015-1179-4. Epub 2015 May 8.
In this study, we aimed to compare the results of transesophageal electrophysiologic studies (TEEPS) and intracardiac electrophysiologic studies (IEPS) in a cohort of pediatric patients with SVTs. The medical records of children aged between 0 and 18 years who underwent TEEPS between January 2007 and June 2012 were systematically reviewed, and those without pre-excitation and who underwent subsequent IEPS were identified. Post-procedural diagnoses were compared for compatibility. A total of 162 patients were included in the study with a mean age at diagnosis 11.6 ± 3.6 years. Tachycardia was induced in 152 patients by TEEPS and in 154 patients by IEPS. Overall, in 147 patients, tachycardia was induced by both TEEPS and IEPS. Diagnoses were compatible in 135 out of 147 patients (91.8 %). Nine out of the 12 patients with discrepant results were diagnosed with atrioventricular-reentrant tachycardia (AVRT) and three with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) after TEEPS. Following IEPS, TEEPS diagnosis of AVRT was revised to typical AVNRT in 5 patients and atypical AVNRT in 4 patients. Two of the 3 patients who were diagnosed as having AVNRT following TEEPS were confirmed to have atrial tachycardia after IEPS, while the other patient was diagnosed with AVRT. Tachycardia terminated spontaneously in 3 patients, while overdrive pacing was attempted to terminate the tachycardia in 149 patients, with a success rate of 93.2 % (139/149). The diagnostic compatibility between TEEPS and IEPS is quite high. A diagnostic discrepancy mostly occurs in patients diagnosed with AVRT by TEEPS, and the possibility of atypical AVNRT should be considered in patients with a VA ≥70 ms to avoid such discrepancies.
在本研究中,我们旨在比较一组小儿室上性心动过速(SVT)患者经食管电生理检查(TEEPS)和心内电生理检查(IEPS)的结果。系统回顾了2007年1月至2012年6月期间接受TEEPS检查的0至18岁儿童的病历,并确定了无预激且随后接受IEPS检查的患儿。比较术后诊断的一致性。共有162例患者纳入研究,诊断时的平均年龄为11.6±3.6岁。TEEPS诱发心动过速152例,IEPS诱发心动过速154例。总体而言,147例患者TEEPS和IEPS均诱发了心动过速。147例患者中有135例(91.8%)诊断结果一致。12例结果不一致的患者中,9例经TEEPS诊断为房室折返性心动过速(AVRT),3例为房室结折返性心动过速(AVNRT)。IEPS后,TEEPS诊断为AVRT的患者中有5例修订为典型AVNRT,4例修订为非典型AVNRT。TEEPS诊断为AVNRT的3例患者中,2例经IEPS确诊为房性心动过速,另1例诊断为AVRT。3例患者心动过速自发终止,149例患者尝试超速起搏终止心动过速,成功率为93.2%(139/149)。TEEPS与IEPS之间的诊断一致性相当高。诊断差异大多发生在TEEPS诊断为AVRT的患者中,对于VA≥70 ms的患者应考虑非典型AVNRT的可能性,以避免此类差异。